In-hospital outcomes after switching from a bivalirudin-first strategy to an unfractionated heparin-first strategy for percutaneous coronary interventions
Research article published in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy (2018)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal anticoagulation strategy for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) remains debated. We report outcomes after switching from a bivalirudin-first to an unfractionated heparin (UFH)-first strategy for PCIs in a large academic center. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI from June 1st 2013-May 31st, 2015 were identified through the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR), and divided into the "bivalirudin era" (June 2013-July 2014) and the "UFH era" (October 2014-May 2015). Bleeding outcomes were compared using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1,145 patients were identified (bivalirudin era =752, UFH era =393). Radial access for PCI increased over time, and was lower in the bivalirudin era (26% vs. 34%, P<0.05). There were 32 major bleeds (4.3%) in the bivalirudin era and 29 major bleeds (7.4%) in the UFH era (P=0.03), with the majority being hemoglobin drops (≥3 g/dL) without overt clinical bleeding (85.7% of bleeds in the bivalirudin era and 86.2% of bleeds in the UFH era). After adjustments for other common major causes of bleeding, bivalirudin was associated with 78% lower odds of bleeding (OR =0.22; 95% CI: 0.05-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in major bleeding events occurred after switching to an UFH-first strategy, primarily associated with hemoglobin drop (≥3 g/dL) without overt clinical bleeding. Major overt bleeding was rare (0.3%) and similar in both groups. These results suggest a UFH-first strategy for PCI may have a role in patients with low bleeding risk.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to anticoagulation, leech therapy, and microsurgical flap management. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This single-center registry analysis compared anticoagulation strategies for percutaneous coronary intervention before and after the institution switched from a bivalirudin-first to an unfractionated-heparin-first approach; among 1,145 patients the abstract reports more major bleeds in the heparin era (7.4% vs 4.3%, P=0.03, mostly hemoglobin drops without overt bleeding), with bivalirudin associated with 78% lower adjusted odds of bleeding, while overt major bleeding was rare and similar in both groups. The relevance to hirudotherapy is mechanistic and indirect: bivalirudin is a synthetic peptide engineered from hirudin, the medicinal leech's direct thrombin inhibitor, so this is a real-world data point in the broader 'leech secretome to anticoagulant drug' lineage. Caveat: this is a non-randomized before-after cohort at one academic center, subject to confounding by era (radial access also rose over time) — it suggests, but cannot establish, a bleeding advantage, and it concerns a hirudin-derived drug rather than leech therapy itself.
Citation
In-hospital outcomes after switching from a bivalirudin-first strategy to an unfractionated heparin-first strategy for percutaneous coronary interventions.
Jaswaney et al. · Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2018
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026