American Society of Hirudotherapy

Antithrombotic therapy for acute coronary syndrome: Past, present and future.

Review published in Thrombosis and haemostasis (2017)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewDrug DevelopmentSalivary PharmacologySibbing et al. · Thrombosis and haemostasis, 2017

Abstract

Plaque erosions and ruptures are the histopathological hallmarks of arterial thrombus formation in the coronary arteries. The clinical condition associated with this process is usually referred to as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Importantly, both blood platelets and the coagulation cascade are key players for initiation, amplification and perpetuation of ACS. There has been great progress in ACS treatment in recent decades, both at the technical level of (percutaneous) revascularisation and at the level of antithrombotic treatment. Numerous trials have led to significant advancements in the development of effective anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs. The large number of randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and the huge number of patients enrolled in these RCTs, with mega trials including >10,000 patients, is unique in the history of medical research and also reflects the exceptional efforts associated with these huge research activities. The crucial issue, however, with respect to optimising treatment, relates to finding the delicate balance between the reduction of thrombotic events by effective drug treatment and the induction of bleeding that is linked to the use of potent or multiple antithrombotic agents. Interestingly, there is a gap in modern days between current guideline recommendations favouring potent platelet inhibition in ACS and the utilization of the respective drugs in clinical practice. In this review, we will summarise and discuss the past, present and future antithrombotic treatment for ACS patients with a focus on the development of optimised antiplatelet treatment strategies and their utilisation in the real world.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAcute Coronary SyndromeAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationBlood PlateletsFibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThrombosis

Summary

Plaque erosions and ruptures are the histopathological hallmarks of arterial thrombus formation in the coronary arteries. The clinical condition associated with this process is usually referred to as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Importantly, both blood platelets and the coagulation cascade are key players for initiation, amplification and perpetuation of ACS.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This review traces the past, present, and future of antithrombotic therapy for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), where plaque erosion and rupture trigger platelet- and coagulation-driven coronary thrombosis; the authors frame the central problem as the delicate balance between reducing thrombotic events and inducing bleeding with potent or combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. For ASH this frames why the medicinal-leech secretome is studied as a drug-discovery source: leech-derived molecules such as hirudin (a direct thrombin inhibitor) and antiplatelet factors target the same coagulation cascade and platelet pathways this review identifies, and the same bleeding-versus-thrombosis tradeoff governs any anticoagulant lead. As a narrative review of established cardiology pharmacotherapy, it provides background context only; it does not study leeches, leech-derived agents, or hirudotherapy, and makes no claim about them.

Citation

Antithrombotic therapy for acute coronary syndrome: Past, present and future.

Sibbing et al. · Thrombosis and haemostasis, 2017

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.