American Society of Hirudotherapy

Impact of heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time on hospitalization and safety outcomes in PCI for acute coronary syndrome

Cohort analysis published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical LiteratureDrug DevelopmentWang G et al. · Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is increasingly used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the optimal interval between discontinuing unfractionated heparin (UFH) and initiating bivalirudin remains unclear. This study examined the association between heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 197 ACS patients undergoing PCI. Bridging intervals were evaluated using two predefined thresholds: Scenario A (≤30 vs. >30 min) and Scenario B (≤20 vs. >20 min). Clinical, laboratory, and procedural data were collected. Outcomes included bleeding events, cardiovascular events, rehospitalization, and composite adverse outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression and binomial regression with generalized estimating equations were performed, and restricted cubic spline analyses assessed non-linear associations. RESULTS: In Scenario A, hospitalization occurred significantly less frequently in the ≤30-min group compared with the >30-min group (8.9% vs. 21.6%). After adjustment, longer intervals were associated with higher hospitalization risk (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.20-8.54; RR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.15-5.66). No differences were observed for bleeding, cardiovascular events, or composite outcomes. In Scenario B, no significant associations were identified for any outcomes. Spline analyses revealed no dose-response relationship between bridging time and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging interval of ≤30 min may reduce hospitalization without increasing bleeding or cardiovascular events, whereas a 20-min threshold offers no clinical advantage. Bridging time may represent a modifiable procedural parameter that warrants further evaluation in prospective randomized trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2400089671.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

A retrospective cohort of 197 ACS patients undergoing PCI compared heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging intervals. Bridging ≤30 minutes was associated with lower hospitalization (8.9% vs 21.6%) than longer intervals, with no bleeding or cardiovascular differences.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This retrospective cohort study of 197 acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention examined the association between heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time and clinical outcomes including bleeding, cardiovascular events, and rehospitalization. The abstract makes no mention of leeches, hirudin, leech saliva, or hirudotherapy. Bivalirudin (formerly Hirulog) is a synthetic peptide anticoagulant designed partly on the C-terminal sequence of hirudin, the anticoagulant of the medicinal leech (Maraganore et al., 1990); this paper studies the drug, not leech therapy.

Citation

Reference (Vancouver style)

Wang G, Yang B, Zhang R, Liu X. Impact of heparin-to-bivalirudin bridging time on hospitalization and safety outcomes in PCI for acute coronary syndrome. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2026;13:1752565. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2026.1752565. PMID: 42051432

Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.