American Society of Hirudotherapy

Epidemiology of anticoagulation for children supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States: A Pediatric Hospital Information System database study

Research article published in Perfusion (2023)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentNellis ME et al. · Perfusion, 2023

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Due to the risk of thrombosis, nearly all children supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) receive systemic anticoagulation. While heparin has traditionally been used, there are reports of increased use of direct thrombin inhibitors. We sought to describe the use of anticoagulation in children supported by ECMO in the United States using a large administrative database. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children supported by ECMO within the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. Pediatric encounters involving ECMO from 2012 to 2020 were identified. Data regarding demographics, diagnoses, anticoagulation, complications, and outcomes were extracted for eligible encounters. RESULTS: Eleven thousand five hundred ninety-five encounters that involved ECMO were identified. Fifty-four percent were male with an age range of 0-17 years and a median (IQR) age of 0 (0-2) years. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) only was used in 94% (95% CI: 93.6-94.5%) of encounters and UFH followed by bivalirudin in 5% (95% CI: 4.3-5.1%) of cases. There was a significant difference in the use of bivalirudin from 2012 to 2020 (p < 0.001). Differences in anticoagulation regimens were observed between infants and children (p = 0.004) and between those with and without cardiac indications for ECMO (p < 0.001). Four percent (95% CI: 4.1-4.8%) of encounters were associated with diagnostic coding for thrombosis and differences in occurrence of thrombosis were observed between different anticoagulant regimens (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Though the majority of children on ECMO in the United States receive heparin anticoagulation, there is an increase in use of direct thrombin inhibitors. Prospective studies must evaluate the efficacy of different anticoagulants in this patient population.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsInfantHumansMaleChildUnited StatesInfant, NewbornChild, PreschoolAdolescentFemaleHeparinExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRetrospective Studies

Summary

Epidemiology of anticoagulation for children supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States: A Pediatric Hospital Information System database study.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This retrospective cohort study of 11,595 pediatric ECMO encounters in a U.S. administrative database (2012-2020) found that unfractionated heparin alone was used in 94% of cases while heparin followed by the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin was used in about 5%, with a significant rise in direct thrombin inhibitor use over the period and differences in thrombosis occurrence across anticoagulant regimens. Its relevance to hirudotherapy is contextual rather than direct: it documents real-world clinical adoption of direct thrombin inhibitors, the same mechanistic class as the leech-derived anticoagulant hirudin and its analogs, situating the leech-secretome drug-discovery story within the broader anticoagulation landscape. The clear caveat is that this paper studies heparin and bivalirudin in critically ill children on ECMO and says nothing about medicinal leeches, hirudin, or hirudotherapy; the authors themselves note that prospective studies are still needed to compare anticoagulant efficacy in this population.

Citation

Epidemiology of anticoagulation for children supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States: A Pediatric Hospital Information System database study

Nellis ME et al. · Perfusion, 2023

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.