American Society of Hirudotherapy

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Research article published in Chest (2012)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Practice guidelineClinical TrialsLinkins et al. · Chest, 2012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated adverse drug reaction that can lead to devastating thromboembolic complications, including pulmonary embolism, ischemic limb necrosis necessitating limb amputation, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke. METHODS: The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement. RESULTS: Among the key recommendations for this article are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom clinicians consider the risk of HIT to be > 1%, we suggest that platelet count monitoring be performed every 2 or 3 days from day 4 to day 14 (or until heparin is stopped, whichever occurs first) (Grade 2C). For patients receiving heparin in whom clinicians consider the risk of HIT to be < 1%, we suggest that platelet counts not be monitored (Grade 2C). In patients with HIT with thrombosis (HITT) or isolated HIT who have normal renal function, we suggest the use of argatroban or lepirudin or danaparoid over other nonheparin anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with HITT and renal insufficiency, we suggest the use of argatroban over other nonheparin anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with acute HIT or subacute HIT who require urgent cardiac surgery, we suggest the use of bivalirudin over other nonheparin anticoagulants or heparin plus antiplatelet agents (Grade 2C). CONCLUSIONS: Further studies evaluating the role of fondaparinux and the new oral anticoagulants in the treatment of HIT are needed.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticlePractice GuidelineReview
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsDrug Therapy, CombinationEvidence-Based MedicineFibrinolytic AgentsHeparinHumansInternational Normalized RatioPlatelet CountRisk FactorsSocieties, MedicalThrombocytopeniaThromboembolism

Summary

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), described as an antibody-mediated adverse drug reaction that can lead to devastating thromboembolic complications including pulmonary embolism, limb necrosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The guideline recommends argatroban, lepirudin, or danaparoid for patients with HIT with thrombosis or isolated HIT and normal renal function (Grade 2C), argatroban for those with renal insufficiency (Grade 2C), and bivalirudin for acute or subacute HIT requiring urgent cardiac surgery (Grade 2C). The abstract lists these as nonheparin anticoagulants but does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, hirudin origins, or the leech secretome. Therefore, its relevance to the American Society of Hirudotherapy is not supported by this article's content.

Citation

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Linkins et al. · Chest, 2012

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.