Bivalirudin for acute coronary syndromes: premises, promises and doubts
Review published in Thrombosis and haemostasis (2014)
Abstract
Bivalirudin is a valuable anticoagulant option in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Advantages over heparin as a parenteral anticoagulant include more predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, shorter half-life, no need for cofactors, some degree of antiplatelet effect, and the ability to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. Clinical evidence supporting the use of bivalirudin over heparin in current ACS guidelines, however, derives mostly from early randomised trials that may no longer reflect current management patterns, now including the use of oral antiplatelet agents more potent than clopidogrel (i.e. prasugrel or ticagrelor) and a broader implementation of strategies to reduce bleeding (i.e. radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention, and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors only in bailout situations). Defining the fine balance between bivalirudin efficacy and safety over heparins in the context of other antithrombotic treatments remains a challenge in clinical practice, particularly in a fast-evolving scenario, such as ACS, where numerous new trials have been presented in very recent times. Here we provide an up-to-date overview of the evidence on the use of bivalirudin in ACS, with focus on new data, open issues, and future directions.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Bivalirudin is a valuable anticoagulant option in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This review (publication type: Review) provides an up-to-date overview of the evidence on bivalirudin as a parenteral anticoagulant in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The authors discuss bivalirudin's advantages over heparin—including more predictable pharmacokinetics, shorter half-life, no need for cofactors, some antiplatelet effect, and inhibition of clot-bound thrombin—while noting that supporting evidence comes mostly from earlier trials that may not reflect current management with more potent oral antiplatelet agents and broader bleeding-reduction strategies. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudin, or hirudotherapy. Consequently, the article's relevance to ASH's domain is not apparent from the abstract; it addresses pharmaceutical anticoagulation in cardiology without any stated link to live leech therapy or the leech secretome.
Citation
Bivalirudin for acute coronary syndromes: premises, promises and doubts
Capodanno D et al. · Thrombosis and haemostasis, 2014
Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026