American Society of Hirudotherapy

Anticoagulation in children: making the most of little patients and little evidence

Pediatric review published in Blood Cells, Molecules & Diseases (2017)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical TrialsDrug DevelopmentYoung G · Blood cells, molecules & diseases, 2017

Abstract

Thrombotic complications are increasing at a steady and significant rate in children resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in this population. Anticoagulant drugs in children can be divided into the standard agents (heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists) and alternative agents (argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux). This review will compare and contrast the standard and alternative anticoagulants and suggest situations in which it may be appropriate to use argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux. Clearly, the standard anticoagulants all have significant shortcomings including variable pharmacokinetics, issues with therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects. The alternative anticoagulants have properties which overcome these shortcomings and prospective clinical trial data are presented supporting the current and future use of these agents in place of the standard anticoagulants.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsArginineBlood CoagulationChildDrug MonitoringFondaparinuxHeparinHirudinsHumansPeptide FragmentsPipecolic AcidsPolysaccharides

Summary

Pediatric anticoagulation review covering heparin, LMWH, warfarin, DOACs, and direct thrombin inhibitors including bivalirudin and lepirudin in pediatric thrombosis and HIT.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This review compares and contrasts standard pediatric anticoagulants (heparin, low molecular weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists) with alternative agents including argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux, suggesting clinical scenarios where alternatives may be preferable given the standard agents' shortcomings in variable pharmacokinetics, drug monitoring, administration frequency, efficacy, and adverse effects. The authors present prospective clinical trial data supporting current and future use of these alternative anticoagulants in place of standard agents. For ASH's domain, this review has no defensible connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome—the abstract lists bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant without any mention of leeches, hirudin, or drug derivation from leech-derived compounds.

Citation

Anticoagulation in children: making the most of little patients and little evidence.

Young G · Blood cells, molecules & diseases, 2017

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.