American Society of Hirudotherapy

Argatroban in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Early Neurological Deterioration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Research article published in JAMA neurology (2024)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical TrialsZhang et al. · JAMA neurology, 2024

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The effect of argatroban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and early neurological deterioration (END) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of argatroban for END in AIS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, blinded-end point, randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 4, 2020, through July 31, 2022. The date of final follow-up was October 31, 2022. This was a multicenter trial. Eligible patients were adults with AIS who experienced END, which was defined as an increase of 2 or more points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale within 48 hours from symptom onset. Patients who withdrew consent, experienced duplicate randomization, or were lost to follow-up were excluded from the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to the argatroban group and control group within 48 hours of symptom onset. Both groups received standard therapy based on guidelines, including oral mono or dual antiplatelet therapy. The argatroban group received intravenous argatroban for 7 days (continuous infusion at a dose of 60 mg per day for 2 days, followed by 20 mg per day for 5 days) in addition to standard therapy. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The primary end point was good functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3. RESULTS: A total of 628 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [11.9] years; 400 male [63.7%]) were included in this study (argatroban group, 314 [50%] and control group, 314 [50%]). Of these, 18 withdrew consent, 1 had duplicate randomization, and 8 were lost to follow-up. A total of 601 patients with stroke were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Finally, 564 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis as 6 participants in the argatroban group and 31 participants in the control group did not follow the complete protocol. The number of patients with good functional outcome at 90 days was 240 (80.5%) in the argatroban group and 222 (73.3%) in the control group (risk difference, 7.2%; 95% CI, 0.6%-14.0%; risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20; P = .04). The proportion of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 3 of 317 (0.9%) in the argatroban group and 2 of 272 (0.7%) in the control group (P = .78). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with AIS with END, treatment with argatroban and antiplatelet therapy resulted in a better functional outcome at 90 days. This trial provided evidence to support the use of argatroban in reducing disability for patients with END. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04275180.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAdultHumansMaleAgedIschemic StrokeStrokePipecolic AcidsAnticoagulantsArginineSulfonamides

Summary

Argatroban in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Early Neurological Deterioration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This open-label, blinded-endpoint randomized trial in 628 patients with acute ischemic stroke and early neurological deterioration found that adding intravenous argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, to antiplatelet therapy increased good 90-day functional outcomes (80.5% versus 73.3%; risk ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20) without a significant rise in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Its relevance to ASH lies in mechanism: argatroban validates direct thrombin inhibition as a clinically meaningful antithrombotic strategy, the same target class as hirudin, the leech-derived thrombin inhibitor that anchors the medicinal-leech secretome drug-discovery narrative. However, argatroban is a synthetic small molecule, not a leech product, and this single open-label trial in a specific stroke population does not by itself establish a clinical benefit for hirudin or for hirudotherapy.

Citation

Argatroban in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Early Neurological Deterioration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zhang et al. · JAMA neurology, 2024

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.