Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes
Review published in Gland surgery (2015)
Abstract
Breast reconstruction can be performed using a variety of techniques, most commonly categorized into an alloplastic approach or an autologous tissue method. Both strategies have certain risk factors that influence reconstructive outcomes and complication rates. In alloplastic breast reconstruction, surgical outcomes and complication rates are negatively impacted by radiation, smoking, increased body mass index (BMI), hypertension, and prior breast conserving therapy. Surgical factors such as the type of implant material, undergoing immediate breast reconstruction, and the use of fat grafting can improve patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes. In autologous breast reconstruction, radiation, increased BMI, certain previous abdominal surgery, smoking, and delayed reconstruction are associated with higher complication rates. Though a pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is the most common type of flap used for autologous breast reconstruction, pedicled TRAMs are more likely to be associated with fat necrosis than a free TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Fat grafting can also be used to improve aesthetic outcomes in autologous reconstruction. This article focuses on factors, both patient and surgical, that are predictors of complications and outcomes in breast reconstruction.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
This review summarizes factors predicting complications in breast reconstruction, noting that radiation, smoking, higher BMI, hypertension, and prior breast-conserving therapy worsen outcomes in alloplastic reconstruction, while delayed autologous reconstruction, prior abdominal surgery, and radiation raise complication rates with flaps.
Context
This review examines predictors of complications and outcomes in breast reconstruction, covering both alloplastic and autologous approaches and discussing patient and surgical factors that influence reconstructive outcomes. For autologous reconstruction, risk factors including radiation, increased BMI, prior abdominal surgery, smoking, and delayed reconstruction are associated with higher complication rates; free TRAM and DIEP flaps show less fat necrosis than pedicled TRAM flaps. The article does not mention leeches or hirudotherapy at any point. Autologous free tissue transfer is a reconstructive context where flap complications may be managed clinically.
Citation
Reference (Vancouver style)
Voineskos SH, Frank SG, Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes. Gland Surg. 2015;4(6):484-496. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.13. PMID: 26645003
Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026