Using metabarcoding to compare the suitability of two blood-feeding leech species for sampling mammalian diversity in North Borneo
Research article published in Molecular ecology resources (2018)
Abstract
The application of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for metabarcoding of mixed samples offers new opportunities in conservation biology. Recently, the successful detection of prey DNA from the guts of leeches has raised the possibility that these, and other blood-feeding invertebrates, might serve as useful samplers of mammals. Yet little is known about whether sympatric leech species differ in their feeding preferences, and whether this has a bearing on their relative suitability for monitoring local mammalian diversity. To address these questions, we collected spatially matched samples of two congeneric leech species Haemadipsa picta and Haemadipsa sumatrana from lowland rainforest in Borneo. For each species, we pooled ~500 leeches into batches of 10 individuals, performed PCR to target a section of the mammalian 16S rRNA locus and undertook sequencing of amplicon libraries using an Illumina MiSeq. In total, we identified sequences from 14 mammalian genera, spanning nine families and five orders. We found greater numbers of detections, and higher diversity of OTUs, in H. picta compared with H. sumatrana, with rodents only present in the former leech species. However, comparison of samples from across the landscape revealed no significant difference in mammal community composition between the leech species. We therefore suggest that H. picta is the more suitable iDNA sampler in this degraded Bornean forest. We conclude that the choice of invertebrate sampler can influence the detectability of different mammal groups and that this should be accounted for when designing iDNA studies.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed research on therapeutic compound development relevant to leech-derived anticoagulants and antithrombotic agents. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This field study collected spatially matched samples of two congeneric terrestrial leech species (Haemadipsa picta and H. sumatrana) from lowland rainforest in Borneo, pooled roughly 500 leeches per species into batches of 10, and used Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding of a mammalian 16S rRNA segment from their bloodmeals to detect sequences from 14 mammalian genera (nine families, five orders), finding more detections and higher OTU diversity (including rodents, present only in H. picta) and concluding H. picta is the more suitable invertebrate-derived-DNA (iDNA) sampler in this degraded forest. It is relevant to hirudotherapy chiefly as a window onto leech biology and host-feeding behavior, and as a reminder that blood-feeding leeches ingest and retain host material, which is conceptually pertinent to bloodborne-pathogen considerations in clinical leech use. Caveat: this is a biodiversity/conservation methods study of wild jungle leeches, not the medicinal species Hirudo medicinalis and not a clinical study; it has no bearing on therapeutic efficacy or patient safety and is purely contextual.
Citation
Using metabarcoding to compare the suitability of two blood-feeding leech species for sampling mammalian diversity in North Borneo.
Drinkwater R et al. · Molecular ecology resources, 2018
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026