American Society of Hirudotherapy

Dosing lepirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and normal or impaired renal function: a single-center experience with 68 patients

Clinical study published in Blood (2008)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Clinical trialClinical TrialsDrug DevelopmentTschudi M et al. · Blood, 2008

Abstract

The recommended dose (bolus 0.4 mg/kg followed by 0.15 mg/kg per hour) of lepirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor licensed for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is too high. Starting in 2001, we omitted the bolus and reduced maintenance dose by at least one-third. Analyzing 53 HIT patients treated between January 2001 and February 2007, we observed that therapeutic anticoagulation intensity already 4 hours after lepirudin start had been reached with the following initial lepirudin doses (median): 0.078 mg/kg per hour [creatinine clearance (CrCl) more than 60 mL/min], 0.040 mg/kg per hour (CrCl 30-60 mL/min), and 0.013 mg/kg per hour (CrCl < 30 mL/min). The efficacy of this treatment was documented by increasing platelets and decreasing D-dimers. Based on this experience, we derived a lepirudin dosing regimen, which was prospectively evaluated treating 15 HIT patients between March 2007 and February 2008. We show that omitting the initial lepirudin bolus and administering 0.08 mg/kg per hour in patients with CrCl more than 60 mL/min, 0.04 mg/kg per hour in patients with CrCl 30-60 mL/min, and 0.01 to 0.02 mg/kg per hour in those with CrCl less than 30 mL/min is efficacious and safe, as documented by increasing platelet counts, decreasing D-dimer levels, and rare thrombotic (1 of 46) and major bleeding (4 of 46) complications.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeClinical TrialJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsBlood Cell CountBlood PlateletsCreatineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeparinHirudinsHumans

Summary

Reduced-dose lepirudin protocol omitting the initial bolus and using 0.08, 0.04 or 0.01–0.02 mg/kg/h infusion based on creatinine clearance achieved therapeutic anticoagulation in 68 HIT patients with rare thrombotic (1/46) or major bleeding (4/46) events.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This study examined lepirudin dosing in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), finding that the recommended regimen (0.4-mg/kg bolus followed by 0.15 mg/kg/h infusion) was too high. The authors omitted the bolus and reduced maintenance doses by at least one-third, analyzing 53 HIT patients treated between January 2001 and February 2007 and deriving a renal-function-stratified regimen that was prospectively evaluated in 15 additional HIT patients between March 2007 and February 2008. The regimen (0.08 mg/kg/h for CrCl >60, 0.04 for 30–60, 0.01–0.02 for <30 mL/min) proved efficacious and safe, with rare thrombotic (1/46) and major bleeding (4/46) complications. The abstract identifies lepirudin as a direct thrombin inhibitor licensed for HIT treatment but does not mention hirudin, leech saliva, leech therapy, or any leech-derived origin. Although the drug name "lepirudin" suggests a connection, the abstract itself provides no leech-related content, and the relevance to hirudotherapy is not established by the abstract.

Citation

Dosing lepirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and normal or impaired renal function: a single-center experience with 68 patients.

Tschudi M et al. · Blood, 2008

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.