The Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Complications of Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction
Research article published in Annals of surgical oncology (2023)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Machine learning has been increasingly used for surgical outcome prediction, yet applications in head and neck reconstruction are not well-described. In this study, we developed and evaluated the performance of ML algorithms in predicting postoperative complications in head and neck free-flap reconstruction. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of patients who underwent microvascular head and neck reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018. Data were used to develop and evaluate nine supervised ML algorithms in predicting overall complications, major recipient-site complication, and total flap loss. RESULTS: We identified 4000 patients who met inclusion criteria. Overall, 33.7% of patients experienced a complication, 26.5% experienced a major recipient-site complication, and 1.7% suffered total flap loss. The k-nearest neighbors algorithm demonstrated the best overall performance for predicting any complication (AUROC = 0.61, sensitivity = 0.60). Regularized regression had the best performance for predicting major recipient-site complications (AUROC = 0.68, sensitivity = 0.66), and decision trees were the best predictors of total flap loss (AUROC = 0.66, sensitivity = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: ML accurately identified patients at risk of experiencing postsurgical complications, including total flap loss. Predictions from ML models may provide insight in the perioperative setting and facilitate shared decision making.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
Drawing on a retrospective review of 4,000 microvascular head-and-neck free-flap patients, this study developed and tested nine supervised machine-learning algorithms to predict complications; per the abstract 33.7% had any complication, 26.5% a major recipient-site complication, and 1.7% total flap loss, with model discrimination modest (best AUROCs of 0.61 for any complication, 0.68 for major recipient-site, and 0.66 for total flap loss). This matters to hirudotherapy because medicinal leeches are a recognized salvage measure for venous congestion in compromised free flaps, so tools that flag flaps at higher risk of failure speak to the same clinical pathway where leech therapy is considered. Honest caveat: this is a predictive-modeling study with only moderate accuracy and no analysis of leech therapy itself; it does not establish that leeching changes any of these outcomes.
Citation
The Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Complications of Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction.
Asaad et al. · Annals of surgical oncology, 2023
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026