American Society of Hirudotherapy

The therapeutic potential of novel anticoagulants

Research article published in Expert opinion on investigational drugs (1997)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentChi et al. · Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 1997

Abstract

Conventional anticoagulant therapy has been based on indirect inhibition of coagulation factors with heparin and warfarin. These agents display liabilities prompting the development of new anticoagulants over the last two decades. The first to be developed was a series of low molecular weight heparins(LMWHs). Their favourable pharmacokinetic profiles and risk/benefit ratios led to widespread use in Europe and, more recently, approval for their use in the USA. Paralleling the development of LMWHs has been the pursuit of a different strategy focused on direct rather than indirect inhibition of enzymes in the coagulation cascade. In contrast to heparin, LMWHs, or other glycosaminoglycans, direct inhibitors exert their effects independent of either antithrombin III (ATIII) or heparin cofactor II (HCII) and more effectively inhibit clot-bound thrombin or FXa. Highly potent, selective (versus other serine proteases)direct thrombin and FXa inhibitors have been identified and isolated from natural sources, such as leeches, ticks and hookworms. The recombinant forms and analogues of the senatural proteins have been produced using molecular biology techniques, i.e., rHirudin, Hirulogs, recombinant tick anticoagulant peptide (rTAP), recombinant antistasin (rATS) and recombinant nematode anticoagulant peptide-5 (rNAP-5). The design of novel structures or the modification of existing chemicals has led to the synthesis of many non-peptide, low molecular weight inhibitors of thrombin and FXa. Some of them are orally active and may be suitable for long-term clinical use. In addition, considerable progress has been made in developing specific TF/VIIa complex inhibitors. The anticoagulation properties of the new agents are being characterised in experimental studies. Some of them have been advanced to large scale clinical trials and their effectiveness, and sometimes relative ineffectiveness,in arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders has been demonstrated. They are being tested for their potential as new antithrombotic agents that act via direct enzyme inhibition. Thus,the clinician should in future be able to target different thrombotic conditions with proven, specific anticoagulant interventions.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

Peer-reviewed research on anticoagulant and antithrombotic drug development relevant to leech-derived and synthetic compounds. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This review traces the move from indirect anticoagulants (heparin, warfarin) toward direct inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa, and explicitly names leeches alongside ticks and hookworms as natural sources from which highly potent, selective direct inhibitors were isolated, including the recombinant hirudin and Hirulog analogues. It is directly relevant to the medicinal-leech secretome story: it situates leech-derived anticoagulants as a foundational lineage in modern drug discovery, with several candidates advanced to large-scale clinical trials for arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders. Caveat: this is a narrative review summarizing work across many agents and sources from the late 1990s, not original trial data, so it establishes historical and mechanistic context rather than current clinical recommendations for any specific leech-derived compound.

Citation

The therapeutic potential of novel anticoagulants.

Chi et al. · Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 1997

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.