Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Budd-Chiari Syndrome

AIMS: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is managed by interventions aimed at relieving hepatic venous obstruction and anticoagulation. Despite robust data supporting the tolerability and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with other venous thromboembolism, its utility in BCS is not well documented. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of DOACs in Primary BCS from the available literature. METHODS: Published studies that reported data on patients with BCS treated with DOACs were included. RESULTS: Two retrospective studies and nine case reports met the criteria for inclusion. The combined data from these two retrospective studies include 58 patients administered DOAC and 101 patients treated with VKA/LMWH. The combined re-stenosis or failure rates after percutaneous endovascular intervention, angioplasty, TIPS, or OLT were 17.2% for the DOAC group and 15.8% for the LMWH/VKA group. The incidence of major bleeding was 8.62% in the DOAC group and 5.94% in the LMWH/VKA group, while minor bleeding rates were 20.7% and 4.95%, respectively. Procedure-related bleeding was 4.5% in DOAC group and 12.8% in VKA/LMWH group. Nine case reports using apixaban in 3, rivaroxaban in 5, and one with dabigatran- described patients tolerating the treatment well and experiencing no major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs appear to be at least equally effective to LMWH/VKA for the anticoagulation of patients with BCS. We believe DOACs to be preferred over LMWH/VKA for the anticoagulation of patients with BCS due to the known advantages in administration, but randomized trials might be needed to answer this question.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Combining two retrospective studies (58 DOAC, 101 VKA/LMWH patients) and nine case reports, DOACs appeared at least equally effective for Budd-Chiari syndrome (re-stenosis/failure 17.2% vs 15.8%), though minor bleeding was more frequent (20.7% vs 4.95%).

Explore how this research connects to clinical practice

More peer-reviewed studies in Clinical Literature.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)
• Hirudotherapy for limb ischemia in the pediatric intensive care unit: A retrospective observational cohort — Resch J et al. (2022)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →