Targeting factor XI as a compromise between thrombosis and bleeding

Thromboembolic diseases have long been a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, necessitating advances in anticoagulant drugs. Heparins, vitamin K inhibitors, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are well-established drug classes that help prevent thromboembolic complications. While effective, they pose significant risks during long-term therapy, including bleeding, osteoporosis, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and the need for frequent monitoring and dose adjustments. Factor XI (FXI) inhibitors represent an innovative approach in anticoagulation therapy, aiming to balance thromboembolic events with the risk of bleeding complications. They include: a) orally administered small molecule inhibitors such as milvexian and asundexian; b) monoclonal antibodies such as abelacimab, osocimab, and xisomab, which specifically bind and inactivate FXI; c) FXI-antisense oligonucleotide (FXI-ASO), which downregulate FXI synthesis at the mRNA level and reduce plasma FXI concentrations. Available data indicate that FXI inhibitors decrease the risk of thromboembolic events and are associated with a lower incidence of major bleeding than current gold standard methods. Hence, FXI inhibitors may become the preferred anticoagulant class, especially for patients with elevated bleeding risk. Their development is an important step in the history of anticoagulant therapy, striving to find a balance between preventing thromboembolism and reducing bleeding risk, ultimately improving patient outcomes. In this context, a discussion on the characteristics of FXI inhibitors, a summary on data regarding the efficacy and safety of FXI inhibitors based on preclinical and clinical studies, and an outline of future perspectives regarding therapeutic strategies of FXI inhibition in venous thrombosis are presented in this study.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Explore how this research connects to clinical practice

More peer-reviewed studies in Safety & Infection Control.

• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• AIF-1 and RNASET2 Play Complementary Roles in the Innate Immune Response of Medicinal Leech — Baranzini N et al. (2019)
• [Hirudo medicinalis-leech applications in plastic and reconstructive microsurgery--a literature review] — Knobloch K et al. (2007)
• Bacterial symbioses of the medicinal leech Hirudo verbana — Nelson M, Graf J (2012)
• Leech related Aeromonas complex infection after reconstruction with a microvascular forearm flap — Beger B, von Loewenich F, Goetze E, Moergel M, Walter C (2016)
• Aeromonas septicemia after medicinal leech use following replantation of severed digits — Levine SM, Frangos SG, Hanna B, Colen K, Levine JP (2009)
• Outcomes of flap salvage with medicinal leech therapy — Nguyen MQ et al. (2012)
• The role of leech water sampling in choice of prophylactic antibiotics in medical leech therapy — Wilmer A et al. (2013)
• The development and application of mini-barcodes from mitochondrial DNA for identifying medicinal leeches from traditional medicines — Liu Y et al. (2025)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →