Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO
Research article published in Journal of clinical anesthesia (2021)
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Viscoelastic point-of-care (POC) tests are commonly used to provide prompt diagnosis of coagulopathy and allow targeted treatments in bleeding patients on ECMO. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care (POC) testing for anticoagulation management in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies evaluating the use of thromboelastography- or thromboelastometry-guided algorithms, anti-factor Xa and platelet function testing were selected after screening the literature from July 1975 to January 2020. SETTING: Patients on ECMO support. PATIENTS: Anticoagulation management on ECMO patients. INTERVENTIONS: Rotational thromboelastometry, thromboelastography, alone or combined with platelet function testing. Trials monitoring the anticoagulation effects during ECMO using an anti-factor Xa assay were included in the systematic review. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were bleeding events, surgical revisions, thrombosis events and ECMO circuit change/failure. Secondary outcomes were blood-product transfusions, cerebrovascular accidents, mortality on ECMO, ECMO duration, intensive care unit and hospital discharge rates, and in-hospital mortality. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-one trials enrolling 1684 participants were included in the systematic review. Four trials enrolling 547 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The use of a POC testing device resulted in improved detection of surgical bleeding (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94, I2 = 0%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.02). The use of POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding (RR:0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.04, I2 = 47%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.09), thrombosis events (RR:1.35, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.12, I2 = 37%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.19), or ECMO circuit/change (RR:0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.71, I2 = 28%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Routine use of POC tests did not improve the main clinical outcomes beyond suggesting a diagnosis of surgical bleeding in ECMO patients.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This systematic review and meta-analysis (31 trials in the review, 4 trials with 547 subjects in the meta-analysis) evaluated point-of-care viscoelastic and related tests for anticoagulation management during ECMO and found that routine POC testing improved detection of surgical bleeding but did not significantly reduce overall bleeding, thrombosis events, or ECMO circuit change/failure. It is relevant to the hirudotherapy evidence picture indirectly: it concerns the broader problem of balancing bleeding against clotting on extracorporeal circuits where heparin is standard, the same hemostatic tension that motivates interest in direct thrombin inhibitors and the leech-derived anticoagulant lineage (e.g., hirudin/bivalirudin) in anticoagulation research. The caveat is that this is a meta-analysis of monitoring strategies in ECMO, not of leech therapy or leech-derived drugs, and the pooled analysis rested on only a few trials.
Citation
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO.
Jiritano et al. · Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2021
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026