American Society of Hirudotherapy

Safety and Outcomes of Dabigatran Reversal With Idarucizumab Before IV Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Research article published in Neurology (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyClinical TrialsSafety & Infection ControlSalivary PharmacologySflund M et al. · Neurology, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV thrombolysis (IVT) is contraindicated in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) while on dabigatran or other oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. Idarucizumab completely reverses the effect of dabigatran within minutes, without increasing the risk of thromboembolism. Limited data exist on IVT treatment after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. We aimed to investigate the safety and outcomes of IVT after dabigatran reversal in patients with AIS. METHODS: This is an observational study based on the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke (SITS) International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry. Hospitals treating patients with AIS contributed data. The main outcome was safety as measured by any parenchymal hematoma (PH), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) per SITS, and death within 3 months. The secondary outcome was functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 at 3 months. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare patients treated with dabigatran reversal to patients without prior OAC in primary analysis and for secondary analysis between patients treated with dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab to patients on dabigatran without reversal treatment. RESULTS: Among 258,589 IVT treated patients with AIS, 510 were on dabigatran and 156 received dabigatran reversal. Dabigatran reversal patients were older (75 vs 69 years, p < 0.01), had similar median baseline NIH Stroke Scale (9 vs 10, p = 0.47), and longer onset to IVT time (185 vs 150 minutes, p < 0.01) compared with patients without prior OAC treatment (n = 191,648). After PSM analysis where good balance was achieved, patients treated with dabigatran reversal before IVT had similar results in all outcomes as compared with patients treated with IVT without prior OAC (any PH: 3 vs 9%, p = 0.10; SICH: 1 vs 1%, p = 1.00; death: 25 vs 19%, p = 0.33, functional independence: 51 vs 52%, p = 0.95). Secondary analysis showed similar results for all outcomes before and after PSM. DISCUSSION: In our observational study with patients with AIS, IVT treatment after dabigatran reversal was safe and had similar outcomes to IVT treatment without previous OAC. Furthermore, comparison between dabigatran reversal vs no reversal also indicates that IVT is safe for patients on dabigatran without idarucizumab reversal, which is currently being investigated in clinical trials. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that IVT after idarucizumab reversal in patients with AIS who took dabigatran within 48 hours of onset of symptoms is safe and comparable with those of patients with AIS not on prior oral anticoagulation.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleObservational Study
Indexed MeSH termsHumansDabigatranAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMaleAgedFemaleIschemic StrokeThrombolytic TherapyAntithrombinsAged, 80 and overTreatment OutcomeMiddle Aged

Summary

IV thrombolysis (IVT) is contraindicated in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) while on dabigatran or other oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This observational study from the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry investigated the safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab in 156 patients with acute ischemic stroke, using propensity score matching to compare against patients without prior oral anticoagulation (n=191,648). Results showed similar rates of parenchymal hematoma, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, death, and functional independence between groups, providing Class III evidence that IVT after idarucizumab reversal is safe and comparable to non-anticoagulated populations. The study is relevant to ASH only in the broad sense of anticoagulation-related thrombolysis management—a therapeutic space conceptually adjacent to leech anticoagulants. No leeches, hirudin, or leech-derived agents were involved; the connection to hirudotherapy is purely indirect.

Citation

Safety and Outcomes of Dabigatran Reversal With Idarucizumab Before IV Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Sflund M et al. · Neurology, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.