American Society of Hirudotherapy

Argatroban anticoagulation for heparin induced thrombocytopenia in patients with ventricular assist devices

Research article published in Minerva anestesiologica (2012)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentPappalardo et al. · Minerva anestesiologica, 2012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving implantation of ventricular assist devices (VAD) suffer a high incidence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT); the occurrence of this condition is associated with increased complications and worse outcomes. We report our experience in the management of patients who were diagnosed with HIT either before (HITpre) or after (HITpost) implantation of VAD with argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor. METHODS: This retrospective analysis assessed data of VAD patients diagnosed with HIT at Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin between November 2005 and April 2009. Argatroban dose requirements, anticoagulation efficacy and adverse events (death, thromboembolism, bleeding) were recorded. Procedural success (discharge from the hospital, heart transplantation, or recovery of the failing heart) was also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified (11 HITpre, 16 HITpost). Argatroban was effective in obtaining adequate anticoagulation with a reduced dose regimen (0.02-0.42 mcg/Kg/min starting dose; 0.02-1.5 mcg/Kg/min maintenance dose). We noted 5 thromboembolic complications (18%), 6 cases of major bleeding (22%) and 5 deaths (18%), all cause composite adverse end point occurring in 40% of patients. Procedural success was obtained in 81% of patients (92% HITpre, 69% HITpost). As compared to historical controls of patients treated with lepirudin in the period 2000-2005, results were significantly improved. CONCLUSION: Argatroban anticoagulation is feasible in patients with HIT after VAD implantation, without increasing bleeding risk. Its impact in terms of survival should be reviewed also in the light of the technological improvements of assist devices.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeEvaluation StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAdultAgedAnticoagulantsArginineFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart TransplantationHeart-Assist DevicesHeparinHospital MortalityHumansIncidence

Summary

Peer-reviewed pharmacology and drug-development research relevant to anticoagulants and leech-derived compounds. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This retrospective analysis of 27 ventricular assist device patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) reported that the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban achieved adequate anticoagulation at reduced doses without increasing bleeding risk, with procedural success in 81% and outcomes significantly improved versus historical controls treated with lepirudin (a recombinant hirudin). The hirudotherapy relevance lies in the secretome drug-discovery thread: hirudin, the leech's natural anticoagulant, was the prototype direct thrombin inhibitor, and this study sits in the lineage of leech-inspired anticoagulants by benchmarking argatroban against the hirudin analogue lepirudin. This is a small, single-center retrospective series with a historical (non-randomized) comparator, so it is preliminary and concerns a synthetic agent rather than leech therapy or native hirudin itself.

Citation

Argatroban anticoagulation for heparin induced thrombocytopenia in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Pappalardo et al. · Minerva anestesiologica, 2012

Added to ASH library: May 29, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.