American Society of Hirudotherapy

The in vitro anticoagulant effects of danaparoid, fondaparinux, and lepirudin in children compared to adults

Research article published in Thrombosis research (2008)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentIgnjatovic et al. · Thrombosis research, 2008

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Major physiological differences in the coagulation system of children compared to that of adults are well documented. We have previously investigated the age-related differences in response to Unfractionated Heparin (UFH). However, the impact of developmental haemostasis on more recent anticoagulant drugs is unknown. A number of these drugs are approved for use in specific indications in adults and none are approved for use in children. This study aimed to determine whether age-related differences in effect and impact on monitoring tests exist in vitro for danaparoid, fondaparinux and lepirudin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from healthy children and pooled into age-specific pools, in order to obtain sufficient quantity of plasma required for the analysis of the three drugs. Each age-specific pool was spiked with different concentrations of danaparoid, fondaparinux and lepirudin and response was measured using standard techniques. All experiments were repeated using three separate plasma pools. The effect of each drug in children's plasma was compared to the effect in the respective adult plasma pool. RESULTS: Age-related differences in effect on thrombin potential and monitoring tests were observed only with the drug lepirudin. Specifically, APTT for children up to 5 years of age was increased compared to adults; all children had lower ECT results compared to adults; children up to 10 years of age had increased inhibition of ETP as compared to adults. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms age-related differences in response to anticoagulants with predominant anti-IIa effect and highlights the need for further research into this area.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationChildChild, PreschoolChondroitin SulfatesDermatan SulfateFondaparinuxHeparan SulfateHirudins

Summary

Peer-reviewed research on anticoagulant and antithrombotic drug development relevant to thrombin and factor inhibition. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This in vitro study spiked age-specific pooled plasma from healthy children and adults with three anticoagulants (danaparoid, fondaparinux, and lepirudin) and found age-related differences in effect and monitoring only for lepirudin, the recombinant hirudin: APTT was increased in children up to 5 years versus adults, all children had lower ECT results, and children up to 10 years showed increased inhibition of endogenous thrombin potential. For hirudotherapy this is directly relevant because lepirudin is the leech-secretome-derived direct thrombin inhibitor, and the data illustrate that developmental physiology changes how this hirudin descendant behaves, underscoring that leech-derived anticoagulants are not simply scaled by body size. Honest caveat: this is bench work on pooled spiked plasma, not a clinical study in treated children, and the authors themselves frame it as confirming a signal that needs further research; none of these drugs were approved for pediatric use, and the findings concern the purified hirudin analogue rather than medicinal-leech application.

Citation

The in vitro anticoagulant effects of danaparoid, fondaparinux, and lepirudin in children compared to adults.

Ignjatovic et al. · Thrombosis research, 2008

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.