Oblique Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Versus Anterolateral Thigh-Vastus Lateralis Flap for Perineal Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Research article published in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open (2026)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) may result in significant postoperative defects, with high rates of wound healing complications, especially after radiotherapy. No consensus exists regarding the optimal flap for perineal reconstruction after APR. METHODS: This 2-center retrospective study included patients undergoing perineal reconstruction with an oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ORAM) flap or an anterolateral thigh-vastus lateralis (ALT-VL) flap between September 2015 and March 2020. Outcomes of interest were perioperative complications, wound healing time, and length of stay. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included (ORAM, n = 10; ALT-VL, n = 14). The mean length of stay and time to complete healing were 26.7 ± 14.31 and 39.3 ± 38.8 days in the ORAM group, compared with 33.14 ± 17.02 and 20.64 ± 8.76 days in the ALT-VL group, respectively (P = 0.340 and P = 0.167). The groups were also similar for overall (40% versus 28.6%; P = 0.439), major (10% versus 7.1%; P = 0.670), and minor (30% versus 21.4%; P = 0.494) perineal complication rates. Concerning donor-site complications, 3 (30%) patients in the ORAM group developed postoperative bulging, whereas 1 patient in the ALT-VL group experienced postoperative seroma (P = 0.178). CONCLUSIONS: Both ORAM and ALT-VL flaps provided effective and reliable reconstruction of perineal defects after APR, with comparable complication rates. The ALT-VL flap was associated with lower donor-site morbidity, making it a favorable option. ORAM, given the possibility of transabdominal transfer, remains particularly useful when concomitant vaginal wall reconstruction is required.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This two-center retrospective comparative study of 24 patients examined two flaps for perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection, the oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ORAM, n=10) and anterolateral thigh-vastus lateralis (ALT-VL, n=14) flaps, and found comparable perioperative complication and healing outcomes between them, with the ALT-VL flap associated with lower donor-site morbidity. Its relevance to hirudotherapy is indirect and contextual: free and pedicled flap reconstruction is the clinical arena in which leeches are most often deployed as a salvage measure for venous congestion, so this paper helps map the reconstructive landscape rather than reporting on leeches, which the abstract does not mention. The caveat is that this is a small, retrospective, non-randomized comparison with wide confidence on its outcomes and no statistically significant differences reported, so it is hypothesis-informing rather than definitive, and it carries no hirudotherapy-specific evidence.
Citation
Oblique Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Versus Anterolateral Thigh-Vastus Lateralis Flap for Perineal Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
Guillier et al. · Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026