American Society of Hirudotherapy

A Cadaveric Anatomy Study of the Shape-Modified Radial Forearm Flap

Research article published in The Journal of hand surgery (2025)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical TrialsCharvillat et al. · The Journal of hand surgery, 2025

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mateev developed a shape-modified radial forearm flap (SMRFF), the use of which is not widespread. This study aimed to analyze hand subunit defects and combinations thereof that can be reconstructed using the SMRFF. METHODS: An anatomical study of 10 injected cadavers was conducted to investigate the subunits and combinations reachable with SMRFF. The radial pedicle length, the number and locations of radial artery perforators, the skin flap's dimensions and surface area, and the number, dimension, and surface area of skin paddles were recorded. RESULTS: In all 10 cadavers, the dorsum, the palm, all combinations of palmar subunits, and both sides of the first webspace could be covered. Two dorsal proximal phalanges could be covered only when adjacent. The mean radial pedicle length was 19.3 cm. All perforators (diameter > 0.5 mm) were septocutaneous, ranging from 3 to 9 per artery (mean: 6.3). On average, there were two perforators in the proximal third of the forearm, 2.3 in the middle third, and two in the distal third. At the proximal third of the forearm, the mean distance between the lateral epicondyle and the perforator was 6.6 cm. At the middle third of the forearm, this distance was 11.8 cm. At the distal third of the forearm, the mean distance between the perforator and the radial styloid process was 4.3 cm. The mean flap surface area was 98.4 cm2, with 34.4 cm2 for proximal paddles, 28.2 cm2 for middle paddles, and 22.8 cm2 for distal paddles. CONCLUSIONS: The SMRFF can effectively reach various hand subunit defects, offering versatile coverage for palmar and dorsal regions, with detailed perforator and flaps measurements. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study investigates the anatomical feasibility of the SMRFF and demonstrates its adaptability, making it a potentially valuable tool in hand surgery.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansCadaverForearmMaleFemaleSurgical FlapsPerforator FlapRadial ArteryPlastic Surgery ProceduresAgedMiddle Aged

Summary

Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This cadaveric anatomical study dissected 10 injected cadavers to map which hand subunits a shape-modified radial forearm flap (SMRFF) can reach, recording perforator counts (mean 6.3 per radial artery, all septocutaneous), a mean pedicle length of 19.3 cm, and a mean flap surface area of 98.4 cm2, and concluded the SMRFF can cover palmar and dorsal hand regions versatilely. Its connection to hirudotherapy is indirect and upstream: free and pedicled flaps of this type are the clinical context where leeches are sometimes needed to rescue venous-congested transfers, but this paper is purely about anatomical feasibility and flap design. The clear caveat is that this is a cadaver/anatomy study with no living perfusion, no patients, and no mention of leech therapy, so it carries no clinical-evidence weight for hirudotherapy beyond defining the surgical territory in which flap salvage can later become relevant.

Citation

A Cadaveric Anatomy Study of the Shape-Modified Radial Forearm Flap.

Charvillat et al. · The Journal of hand surgery, 2025

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.