Safety of contraception among women using anticoagulant therapy: An updated systematic review
Research article published in Contraception (2025)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Women on anticoagulant therapy are at risk for bleeding and may be at risk for recurrent thrombosis, which may be further increased with use of certain contraceptive methods. Our objective was to update a previous systematic review on safety of contraception among women on anticoagulant therapy. STUDY DESIGN: We searched multiple databases from inception through December 12, 2022 for articles on concurrent use of contraception and anticoagulant therapy. Outcomes were thromboembolism, bleeding, and drug-drug interactions. Among women on anticoagulant therapy, we compared outcomes for women using and not using contraception. We assessed risk of bias for each study, and certainty of evidence for all outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria (12 were new); one had low risk of bias, three had moderate risk of bias, and 10 had high risk of bias. Anticoagulants examined included warfarin, heparin, aspirin, rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, phenindione, acenocoumarol, combined therapy, and unspecified. Four studies (two comparative and two non-comparative studies) in women using anticoagulant therapy found no evidence that use of combined or progestin-only hormonal contraceptive increased the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Ten studies (four comparative and six non-comparative studies) examined uterine bleeding with use of anticoagulant therapy and generally found that bleeding was increased during use of copper intrauterine devices (IUDs) and decreased during use of levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs. Two studies examined pharmacokinetic outcomes and found no decreases in anticoagulant levels with combined oral contraceptive exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests risk for recurrent VTE may not be increased with hormonal contraceptive use among women using anticoagulants. Bleeding among women on anticoagulant therapy might worsen with copper IUD use but might improve with LNG-IUD use. The certainty of evidence for most outcomes is very low. IMPLICATIONS: Women on anticoagulant therapy are at risk for recurrent thrombosis and bleeding, which might be further exacerbated with use of certain contraceptive methods. Additional evidence is needed on safety of concurrent use of anticoagulant medications and contraceptives.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This updated systematic review of 14 studies assessed whether contraceptive use raises thrombosis or bleeding risk in women already on anticoagulant therapy, concluding that limited evidence suggests hormonal contraception may not increase recurrent venous thromboembolism, that copper IUDs may worsen and levonorgestrel IUDs may improve bleeding, and that the certainty of evidence for most outcomes is very low. Its relevance to hirudotherapy is peripheral and contextual: it speaks to the general management of patients on systemic anticoagulants, the same bleeding-versus-thrombosis balance clinicians weigh when leech therapy (which produces local, hirudin-mediated anticoagulant bleeding) is added to a treatment plan. The review covers oral and injectable anticoagulants only, not leeches or hirudin, and the authors themselves rate the evidence as very low certainty, so it should be cited only as background on anticoagulant safety, not as leech-specific evidence.
Citation
Safety of contraception among women using anticoagulant therapy: An updated systematic review.
Nguyen et al. · Contraception, 2025
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026