American Society of Hirudotherapy

The Relationship between Explanation and Patient Compliance in Hirudotherapy

Research article published in Archives of craniofacial surgery (2017)

Last Updated: November 1, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical LiteratureKim K et al. · Archives of craniofacial surgery, 2017

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of leeches can effectively increase the salvage rate of flap congestion. However, the first reaction from patients and carers in using leeches in clinical fields is strong aversion. This can be due to the fact that development of our culture from agriculture to industrial society, coming across leeches became fairly rare. Also because of the biological traits that leeches carry; staying attached to a leg or other body parts of the host, sucking blood, and leaving wounds. METHODS: This study was conducted through questionnaires, divided into many subgroups. We scaled the compliance of the two therapies, with or without leech. Maximum scale of 10 showing no rejective response to the therapy and minimum scale of 0 showing the greatest rejective response. RESULTS: Overall subjects' compliance was improved after explaining the benefits of hirudotherapy. Irrelevant to the explanation, there was no significant difference in general compliance between male and female. Young-aged group and medical personnel or people studying medicine showed higher compliance over older-aged group and the general public. CONCLUSION: In the terms of general social cognition, recognizing leech as a therapeutic material may not be welcomed at first, but provided with proper information and explanations, overall compliance of patients and carers can be improved and consequently result in superior outcomes in flap salvage.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

Questionnaires showed that explaining the benefits of hirudotherapy improved patients' and carers' compliance with leech therapy for flap congestion, with younger people and medical personnel more compliant than older people and the general public.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This questionnaire-based study examined how providing patients and carers with explanations of hirudotherapy's benefits affected their willingness to accept leech therapy for flap congestion salvage, using a 0–10 compliance scale across demographic subgroups. Psychological aversion to leeches is a well-recognized barrier to clinical hirudotherapy, and the finding is that proper explanation improves acceptance. The study also observed higher compliance among younger individuals and those with medical backgrounds. However, the abstract provides limited quantitative detail—no sample size, effect sizes, or statistical results beyond directional statements—and the findings reflect reported attitudes rather than measured clinical outcomes of hirudotherapy itself.

Citation

Reference (Vancouver style)

Kim KS, Sim HS, Shin JH, Hwang JH, Lee SY. The Relationship between Explanation and Patient Compliance in Hirudotherapy. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2017;18(3):179-185. doi:10.7181/acfs.2017.18.3.179. PMID: 29090199

Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.

Added to ASH library: March 18, 2026 · Site last updated: November 1, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.