American Society of Hirudotherapy

Argatroban anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requiring renal replacement therapy

Retrospective study published in The Annals of pharmacotherapy (2005)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Clinical trialClinical LiteratureSafety & Infection ControlSalivary PharmacologyReddy BV et al. · The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2005

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is used for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The recommended initial dose is 2 microg/kg/min (0.5 microg/kg/min in hepatic impairment), adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values 1.5-3.0 times baseline. However, few argatroban-treated patients with HIT and renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) have been described. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of argatroban anticoagulation during RRT in patients with HIT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from 47 patients with HIT and renal failure requiring RRT who underwent 50 treatment courses with argatroban. Patients with HIT had received argatroban during prospective, multicenter studies. Outcomes, safety, and dosing information were summarized. RESULTS: In the multicenter experience, no patient died due to thrombosis and 2 (4%) patients developed new thrombosis while on argatroban. No adverse outcomes occurred during argatroban reexposure. Starting doses were typically 2 microg/kg/min in patients without hepatic impairment and <1.5 microg/kg/min in those with hepatic impairment. Median (range) infusion doses were 1.7 (0.2-2.8) and 0.7 (0.1-1.7) microg/kg/min, respectively, with associated median (range) aPTT ratios, relative to baseline, of 2.2 (1.6-3.6) and 2.0 (1.4-4.1), respectively. Major bleeding occurred in 3 (6%) of 50 treatment courses. CONCLUSIONS: Argatroban provides effective anticoagulation upon initial and repeated administration in patients with HIT and renal impairment requiring RRT, with an acceptably low bleeding risk. Current dosing recommendations are adequate for these patients.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeClinical TrialJournal ArticleMulticenter StudyResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAcute Kidney InjuryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsArginineDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHeparinHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPipecolic AcidsProspective StudiesRenal Replacement TherapyRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesThrombocytopeniaTreatment Outcome

Summary

In 47 HIT patients with renal failure undergoing 50 argatroban treatment courses during renal replacement therapy, median infusion doses were 1.7 µg/kg/min without hepatic impairment and 0.7 µg/kg/min with it, new thrombosis occurred in 4%, and major bleeding in 6%.

Context

This study retrospectively reviewed 47 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy who were treated with argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor. The results showed effective anticoagulation with low rates of new thrombosis (4%) and major bleeding (6%), supporting current dosing recommendations for this specific patient population. Argatroban is identified as a direct thrombin inhibitor.

Citation

Reference (Vancouver style)

Reddy BV, Grossman EJ, Trevino SA, Hursting MJ, Murray PT. Argatroban anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requiring renal replacement therapy. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(10):1601-1605. doi:10.1345/aph.1G033. PMID: 16131539

Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.