American Society of Hirudotherapy

The Preoperative Planning, Design, and Execution of the Freestyle Propeller Flap: A Detailed Description and the Case Series

Case series published in Arch Plast Surg (2025)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical LiteratureSafety & Infection ControlKim HB et al. · Archives of plastic surgery, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Propeller flap reconstruction has been widely utilized in soft tissue reconstruction due to its versatility and aesthetic outcomes. However, technical challenges and the risk of complications persist. This study aims to provide detailed guidelines on the preoperative planning, intraoperative considerations, and execution of propeller flap surgery to reduce complications. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 20 consecutive patients undergoing propeller flap reconstruction between January 2018 and December 2020. Preoperative planning involved computed tomography (CT) angiography and color Doppler ultrasound. Flap designs prioritized perforator proximity (<3 cm from the defect), vessel axiality, and tissue laxity assessed by skin pinch tests. Surgical techniques including pedicle skeletonization, flap elevation, rotation, and inset were meticulously followed. RESULTS: No total flap loss occurred. Partial flap loss was observed in one case (5%). Two flaps (10%) exhibited venous congestion, which resolved following leech therapy without necrosis. Defects were predominantly located on the trunk (80%), with malignancy as the primary cause (55%). Mean follow-up duration was 432 days. CONCLUSIONS: Careful preoperative planning and adherence to meticulous surgical techniques can significantly reduce complications in propeller flap reconstruction. This structured approach offers a reliable framework, particularly beneficial for surgeons less familiar with propeller flap techniques.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

In a retrospective review of 20 consecutive propeller-flap reconstructions, no total flap loss occurred and two flaps (10%) developed venous congestion that resolved with leech therapy without necrosis, supporting structured preoperative planning to reduce complications.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This article reports a case series of 20 consecutive patients undergoing propeller flap reconstruction between January 2018 and December 2020, detailing preoperative planning with CT angiography and color Doppler ultrasound, surgical techniques, and outcomes including no total flap loss, one partial flap loss (5%), and two cases of venous congestion (10%) that resolved following leech therapy without necrosis. The article's primary focus is on surgical planning and execution, and the sample size for leech-treated cases is two patients. The abstract provides no detail on leech species, protocol, duration, or complications specifically attributable to leech therapy.

Citation

Reference (Vancouver style)

Kim HB, Han SJ, Hong JP, Suh HP. The Preoperative Planning, Design, and Execution of the Freestyle Propeller Flap: A Detailed Description and the Case Series. Arch Plast Surg. 2025;52(4):239-246. doi:10.1055/a-2620-3297. PMID: 40709006

Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.