American Society of Hirudotherapy

Personal Strategies for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Prior Abdominal Surgery and Hernia Repairs

Research article published in Archives of plastic surgery (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical TrialsGupta et al. · Archives of plastic surgery, 2026

Abstract

Delayed breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps in patients with a history of abdominal wall hernias and/or cesarean sections presents unique challenges. This study examines 10 such cases, emphasizing key technical considerations. Our findings highlight the importance of lateral row perforators, as medial paraumbilical perforators are often compromised in patients with prior umbilical hernia repairs. Additionally, deep inferior epigastric arteries (DIEAs) may be damaged in previous lower abdominal surgeries, necessitating intraoperative confirmation of vessel patency. While preoperative CT angiography aids in planning, it may misrepresent perforator size or location due to adherence to fascia. In our approach, a gastrointestinal surgeon performed concurrent hernia repair while the plastic surgery team secured the DIEP flap perforators and pedicle. Preservation of umbilical vascularity was ensured by avoiding complete skeletonization. In the case shown, only a single lateral row perforator was usable, despite preoperative imaging suggesting additional perforators. All patients had successful flap integration, with no cases of flap failure, necrosis, postoperative hernias, wound dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, or infection. A delayed flap inset was performed using the Rosebud technique, ensuring optimal aesthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. This study highlights the critical role of a multidisciplinary approach, precise perforator identification, and careful interpretation of preoperative imaging in achieving optimal outcomes in complex DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This case series of 10 delayed DIEP-flap breast reconstructions in patients with prior abdominal surgery or hernia repair describes technical strategies (reliance on lateral-row perforators, intraoperative confirmation of vessel patency, preserved umbilical vascularity, multidisciplinary hernia repair) and reports successful flap integration with no flap failures, necrosis, or major wound complications. It is relevant to hirudotherapy as context for free-flap and microvascular reconstruction, the setting in which medicinal leeches are most often used clinically as a salvage measure for venous congestion, though this report describes neither venous congestion nor leech therapy. The caveat is substantial: this is a small uncontrolled single-team case series (n=10) focused on surgical technique, not a comparative study, and it offers no evidence about leech therapy itself.

Citation

Personal Strategies for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Prior Abdominal Surgery and Hernia Repairs.

Gupta et al. · Archives of plastic surgery, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.