American Society of Hirudotherapy

Perioperative management and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty among heartmate 3 left ventricular assist device recipients

Research article published in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical TrialsTuran et al. · European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate preoperative cardiovascular assessment, perioperative management, and outcomes in HM3 recipients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This retrospective case series included six patients with HM3 LVADs undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. Mean age was 67.4 ± 5.7 years; two were female, and two had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Average ejection fraction was 15 ± 4.5%. RESULTS: Procedures included three knee arthroplasties (50%), two total hip arthroplasties (33.3%), and one hip hemiarthroplasty (16.7%). Median time from LVAD implantation to arthroplasty was 19.2 ± 13.6 months. Patients were admitted an average of 2.7 ± 1.8 days preoperatively; mean postoperative length of stay was 13 days. All patients were anticoagulated with warfarin (mean INR 1.4 ± 0.2), with five requiring heparin bridging. LVAD-related infections developed in three patients (50%), and two (33%) required readmission. At final follow-up, two patients (33%) had died, at a mean of 28 ± 8 months post-arthroplasty and 47 ± 36 months after HM3 implantation. CONCLUSION: Hip and knee arthroplasty in HM3 LVAD recipients can be performed with perioperative management strategies that mitigate excess mortality beyond expected LVAD outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of specialized perioperative care in improving the safety and feasibility of arthroplasty in HM3 LVAD patients. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to refine patient selection, optimize perioperative care, and clarify the value of arthroplasty in this complex population.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This retrospective case series of six HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty described their perioperative anticoagulation management, all on warfarin (mean INR 1.4) with five requiring heparin bridging, and reported notable complication rates including LVAD-related infection in three patients and two deaths at final follow-up. Its tie to hirudotherapy is indirect, sitting in the perioperative anticoagulation and bleeding-versus-thrombosis management literature rather than involving leeches; medicinal leeches are not part of this study. The honest caveat is that this is a very small, single-setting case series of six device patients with no leech intervention, so any bearing on hirudotherapy is general background only, not evidence for or against leech use.

Citation

Perioperative management and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty among heartmate 3 left ventricular assist device recipients.

Turan et al. · European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.