Perioperative anticoagulation management in patients with left ventricular assist devices undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective study of bleeding and thrombosis
Research article published in Journal of thoracic disease (2026)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perioperative anticoagulation management for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery (NCS) remains uncertain, particularly in Asian populations. The safety of direct warfarin interruption without heparin bridging in procedures of different bleeding risks is a key knowledge gap. This study aimed to quantify 30-day thrombotic and bleeding outcomes after elective NCS in a predominantly Chinese LVAD cohort and identify predictors of perioperative bleeding. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult LVAD recipients undergoing elective NCS in Hong Kong (May 2020-April 2025). Anticoagulation strategies [warfarin continuation vs. interruption with/without low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) bridging] and outcomes were collected. Bleeding was classified by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC). Univariable associations among bleeding and non-bleeding group were tested with t-tests and Chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (96.4% Chinese; 94.5% male) underwent 85 procedures [HeartMate II (HMII) 12.7%, HeartMate 3 (HM3) 76.4%, HeartWare 10.9%]; mean 2.52±2.0 years from LVAD implantation to NCS. Warfarin was interrupted without bridging in 84.7%, interrupted with bridging in 7.1%, and continued in 8.2%. Thrombotic events occurred in 1/85 (1.2%). Any bleeding (BARC ≥1) occurred in 10.6%; major bleeding (BARC ≥3a) in 8.2% (3.5% BARC 3a; 4.7% BARC 3b). Thirty-day mortality was 1.2% and readmission 8.2%. Predictors of bleeding included higher creatinine (P<0.001), lower haemoglobin (P=0.02), higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P=0.03), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACEi/ARB/ARNI) use (P=0.02), and heart failure etiology (P=0.03). Warfarin continuation (P=0.56), LMWH bridging (P=0.12), LVAD type (P=0.48), and procedural bleeding risk (>0.9) were not associated with bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Elective NCS in LVAD recipients under locally lower international normalized ratio (INR) targets showed low thrombotic and acceptable bleeding rates. Direct warfarin interruption without bridging, predominantly for minor/low-risk procedures, appeared safe. Renal dysfunction, anemia, elevated ALT, ACEi/ARB/ARNI use, and heart failure etiology may guide individualized perioperative strategies.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This retrospective cohort of 55 predominantly Chinese left-ventricular-assist-device (LVAD) recipients undergoing 85 elective non-cardiac procedures found that direct warfarin interruption without heparin bridging (used in 84.7% of cases, mostly minor/low-risk procedures) was associated with low 30-day thrombosis (1.2%) and acceptable bleeding (10.6% any, 8.2% major), with renal dysfunction, anemia, elevated ALT, ACEi/ARB/ARNI use, and heart-failure etiology emerging as bleeding predictors rather than the anticoagulation strategy itself. For ASH this reinforces the central perioperative theme: managing patients who are systemically anticoagulated and undergoing surgery is fundamentally a bleeding-versus-thrombosis balancing act, the same equation relevant when medicinal leeches, which add a local anticoagulant effect, are considered in surgical patients, and it highlights comorbidity-driven bleeding risk factors a team would want to flag. The caveat is that this is a small, single-region retrospective cohort in a highly specific LVAD population with no leech involvement; its findings are population-specific and exploratory regarding predictors, and it serves as anticoagulation-context background only, not as evidence for or against hirudotherapy.
Citation
Perioperative anticoagulation management in patients with left ventricular assist devices undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective study of bleeding and thrombosis.
Lam et al. · Journal of thoracic disease, 2026
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026