American Society of Hirudotherapy

Differences between human proteinase 3 and neutrophil elastase and their murine homologues are relevant for murine model experiments

Basic science published in FEBS Lett (2005)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentWiesner O et al. · FEBS letters, 2005

Abstract

Direct comparisons of human (h) and murine (m) neutrophil elastase (NE) and proteinase 3 (PR3) are important for the understanding and interpretation of inflammatory and PR3-related autoimmune processes investigated in wild-type-, mNE- and mPR3/mNE knockout mice. To this end, we purified recombinant mPR3 and mNE expressed in HMC1 and 293 cells and compared their biophysical properties, proteolytic activities and susceptibility to inhibitors with those of their human homologues, hPR3 and hNE. Significant species differences in physico-chemical properties, substrate specificities and enzyme kinetics towards synthetic peptide substrates, oxidized insulin B chain, and fibrinogen were detected. MeOSuc-AAPV-pNA and Suc-AAPV-pNA were hydrolyzed more efficiently by mPR3 than hPR3, but enzymatic activities of mNE and hNE were very similar. Fibrinogen was cleaved much more efficiently by mPR3 than by hPR3. All four proteases were inhibited by alpha(1)-antitrypsin and elafin. Eglin C inihibited mNE, hNE, mPR3, but not hPR3. SLPI inhibited both NEs, but neither PR3. The custom-designed hNE inhibitor, Val(15)-aprotinin, is a poor inhibitor for mNE. In conclusion, appropriate interpretation of experiments in murine models requires individual species-specific assessment of neutrophil protease function and inhibition.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsBase SequenceDNA PrimersElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHumansLeukocyte ElastaseMiceMice, KnockoutMyeloblastinRecombinant ProteinsSerine Endopeptidases

Summary

Eglin C inhibits human and murine NE, mouse PR3, but not human PR3, requiring species-specific consideration in animal model experiments for neutrophil-elastase inhibitor development.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This in-vitro comparison purified recombinant murine and human neutrophil elastase (NE) and proteinase 3 (PR3) and found significant species differences in their biophysical properties, substrate specificities, and — importantly here — their susceptibility to inhibitors, reporting for example that the leech-derived inhibitor eglin C blocked human and murine NE and murine PR3 but not human PR3. For the medicinal-leech secretome story this is a small but concrete data point that eglin C (a hirudo-associated protease inhibitor) has measurable, target-selective activity against clinically relevant inflammatory proteases. Honest caveat: this is a biochemical characterization in cell-free systems whose stated aim is to caution that mouse models do not faithfully mirror human protease biology; it makes no claim about leech therapy or patient outcomes and the eglin C finding is incidental to its main purpose.

Citation

Differences between human proteinase 3 and neutrophil elastase and their murine homologues are relevant for murine model experiments.

Wiesner O et al. · FEBS letters, 2005

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.