American Society of Hirudotherapy

Systematic review of drug-drug interactions between rifamycins and anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents and considerations for management.

Review published in Pharmacotherapy (2022)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Systematic reviewDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsMacDougall C et al. · Pharmacotherapy, 2022

Abstract

Rifamycins (rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine) play an essential role in the treatment of mycobacterial and some nonmycobacterial infections. They also induce the activity of various drug transporting and metabolizing enzymes, which can impact the concentrations and efficacy of substrates. Many anticoagulant and antiplatelet (AC/AP) agents are substrates of these enzymes and have narrow therapeutic indices, leading to risks of thrombosis or bleeding when coadministered with rifamycins. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects on AC/AP pharmacokinetics, laboratory markers, and clinical safety and efficacy of combined use with rifamycins. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidance was performed. The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were queried for English-language reports on combination use of rifamycins and AC/AP agents from database inception through August 2021. The 29 studies identified examined warfarin (n = 17), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (n = 8), and antiplatelet agents (n = 4) combined with rifampin (n = 28) or rifabutin (n = 1). Eleven studies were case reports or small case series; 14 reported on pharmacokinetic or laboratory markers in healthy volunteers. Rifampin-warfarin combinations led to reductions in warfarin area under the curve (AUC) of 15%-74%, with variability by warfarin isomer and study. Warfarin dose increases of up to 3-5 times prerifampin doses were required to maintain coagulation parameters in the therapeutic range. DOAC AUCs were decreased by 20%-67%, with variability by individual agent and with rifampin versus rifabutin. The active metabolite of clopidogrel increased substantially with rifampin coadministration, whereas prasugrel was largely unaffected and ticagrelor saw decreases. Our review suggests most combinations of AC/AP agents and rifampin are problematic. Further studies are required to determine whether rifabutin or rifapentine could be safe alternatives for coadministration with AC/AP drugs.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsDrug InteractionsHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRifabutinRifampinRifamycinsWarfarin

Summary

Rifamycins (rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine) play an essential role in the treatment of mycobacterial and some nonmycobacterial infections. They also induce the activity of various drug transporting and metabolizing enzymes, which can impact the concentrations and efficacy of substrates.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This systematic review (PRISMA-guided, 29 studies through August 2021) examined how rifamycin antibiotics — potent inducers of drug-metabolizing and transport enzymes — interact with anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents, finding that rifampin reduced warfarin exposure (AUC down 15-74%) and often required warfarin doses up to 3-5 times higher, while also altering direct oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet (e.g. clopidogrel, ticagrelor) activity; the authors conclude most rifampin/anticoagulant combinations are problematic. For ASH this is a reminder that conventional oral anticoagulants are vulnerable to clinically significant drug-drug interactions and metabolic variability, one of the practical pressures that keeps the search for alternative antithrombotic mechanisms — including the directly-acting peptides of the leech secretome (e.g. hirudin/bivalirudin-class thrombin inhibitors) — scientifically interesting. Honest caveat: this review is about interactions among existing drugs and says nothing about leech therapy; much of its evidence base is case reports and small healthy-volunteer pharmacokinetic studies, and ASH presents it only as field context, not as support for any leech-based intervention.

Citation

Systematic review of drug-drug interactions between rifamycins and anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents and considerations for management.

MacDougall C et al. · Pharmacotherapy, 2022

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.