Pharmacological approaches for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention
Review published in Progress in cardiovascular diseases (1997)
Abstract
A large number of drug trials for prevention of restenosis have been conducted with many showing little or conflicting benefit. Antiplatelets such as aspirin, ticlopidine and thromboxane A2 receptor inhibitors have not shown a clear benefit. Similarly, antithrombotics, either acting indirectly such as heparin, or as direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin and hirulog, do not prevent restenosis. Trials with ACE inhibitors, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fish-oil supplements have yielded inconclusive results. The antiproliferatives, angiopeptin, trapidil and tranilast have shown some benefit in small-scale studies. Other drug classes of potential benefit include the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, inhibitors of the early coagulation cascade, calcium channel blockers and nitric oxide donors. Drug research into restenosis prevention has been hampered by problems with the definition of restenosis and the applicability in humans of animal models. Although no single drug has conclusively proven effective yet, the promise of a number of agents, together with other nonpharmacological strategies will likely result in further reductions in the incidence of restenosis.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
The review summarizes drug trials for restenosis prevention after coronary angioplasty and finds that antiplatelets, heparin, and direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin and hirulog show little benefit, with some small-scale positive signals from antiproliferatives.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This review summarizes drug trials for the prevention of restenosis, noting that many have shown little or conflicting benefit. The abstract states that direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin and hirulog 'do not prevent restenosis,' alongside similar negative findings for antiplatelets and inconclusive results for ACE inhibitors and other agents. The abstract characterizes hirudin only as a direct thrombin inhibitor and does not mention leeches, leech saliva, or hirudotherapy. The article offers no information connecting hirudin to leeches or to live leech therapy; it merely lists hirudin among drugs that failed to prevent restenosis.
Citation
Reference (Vancouver style)
Lefkovits J, Topol EJ. Pharmacological approaches for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997;40(2):141-158. doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(97)80006-0. PMID: 9327830
Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.
Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026