American Society of Hirudotherapy

Modern postoperative monitoring of free flaps.

Review published in Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery (2018)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewClinical TrialsKääriäinen et al. · Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2018

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Flap failure in microvascular reconstruction is a costly complication with total flap loss being the worst-case scenario. With the aim to rapidly identify a postoperative circulatory problem, some susceptible flaps can be saved by careful clinical monitoring or by various technical monitoring methods. In head and neck surgery, where the flaps are often buried and difficult to monitor clinically, a reliable technical monitoring method would be useful. A broad range of different techniques are in use varying according to practical and personal preferences among clinics and surgeons. However, no evidence for any particular technique being superb has emerged. We review reports of some frequently used and modern free flap monitoring techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical monitoring is still the gold standard to which other techniques are compared to. Laser Doppler flowmetry and near-infrared spectroscopy have been reported to identify early circulatory problems, but both techniques are not well suited for buried flaps. Implantable Doppler, flow coupler, partial tissue oxygen pressure and microdialysis are invasive monitoring methods suitable for buried flaps. SUMMARY: More research with practical and clinically relevant parameters, that is flap salvage rate, false positive rate and cost-efficiency are needed before objective comparisons between different monitoring techniques can be made.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsFree Tissue FlapsHumansLaser-Doppler FlowmetryMicrodialysisOxygenSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredUltrasonography, Doppler, Color

Summary

Flap failure in microvascular reconstruction is a costly complication with total flap loss being the worst-case scenario. With the aim to rapidly identify a postoperative circulatory problem, some susceptible flaps can be saved by careful clinical monitoring or by various technical monitoring methods.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This review examined frequently used and modern postoperative monitoring techniques for free flaps, including laser Doppler flowmetry, near-infrared spectroscopy, implantable Doppler, flow coupler, partial tissue oxygen pressure, and microdialysis. It concluded that clinical monitoring remains the gold standard and that more research on flap salvage rate, false positive rate, and cost-efficiency is needed before objective comparisons between techniques can be made. The abstract makes no mention of leeches, hirudotherapy, venous congestion, or any leech-derived substances. There is no defensible leech or hirudotherapy connection in this abstract.

Citation

Modern postoperative monitoring of free flaps.

Kääriäinen et al. · Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2018

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.