Sequential Free Flaps in Lower Extremity Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION: Sequential free flaps are often utilized for complex defects, particularly for recurrent head and neck tumors. However, their application in lower extremity (LE) reconstruction following trauma or oncology is less common. This study evaluated the indications, flap survival rates, and complications of sequential free flaps utilized in LE reconstruction. METHODS: Data from our multicenter database spanning from 2002 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively through chart review. Adult patients who underwent sequential free flaps to the LE without complete initial flap loss were included. Outcome measures included ultimate flap viability and complications associated with sequential reconstructions. RESULTS: A total of 6 patients were identified: 2 patients (33%) required a second reconstruction following trauma, 1 patient (17%) following tumor recurrence, and 3 patients (50%) for chronic wounds related to infection. Most second free flaps survived (83%), with the exception of one in which the patient ultimately underwent a transfemoral amputation. Complications were observed in 3 patients (50%). CONCLUSION: The main indication for second free flap reconstruction in the LE is the failure of durable wound closure with the first reconstruction, despite the absence of flap loss. In these complex scenarios, it is often prudent to utilize preoperative vascular imaging and to use distinct recipient vessels from those used in the first flap. Overall, sequential free flaps can be used in complex cases of limb salvage; however, they are associated with a substantial risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic-IV.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

A retrospective multicenter review of 6 patients found that most second free flaps in lower-extremity reconstruction survived (83%); the main indication was failure of durable wound closure despite no flap loss, though half had complications and one patient needed transfemoral amputation.

Explore how this research connects to clinical practice

More peer-reviewed studies in Clinical Literature.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)
• Hirudotherapy for limb ischemia in the pediatric intensive care unit: A retrospective observational cohort — Resch J et al. (2022)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →