American Society of Hirudotherapy

Thrombosis and bleedings in a cohort of cancer patients treated with apixaban for venous thromboembolism

Research article published in Thrombosis research (2020)

Last Updated: November 1, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical LiteratureDrug DevelopmentHannevik et al. · Thrombosis research, 2020

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The direct oral anti-coagulants (DOAC) edoxaban and rivaroxaban are suggested treatment alternatives for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) together with low molecular-weight heparins. New studies indicate that the DOAC apixaban also is an option for cancer-associated VTE. The current study assessed recurrent VTE, arterial thrombosis, bleedings and adverse events in a cohort of apixaban treated cancer patients with VTE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-arm, interventional study of apixaban as treatment of cancer-associated VTE. Inclusion criteria were cancer with objectively verified VTE. Patients received apixaban 10 mg bid for seven days, then 5 mg bid for six months. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent VTE and bleeding respectively. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02581176. RESULTS: We recruited 298 cancer patients with VTE. During six months treatment, recurrent VTE or death related to VTE occurred in 12 patients (4.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-6.9%). Major bleeding occurred in 16 patients (5.4%, 95% CI 2.8-7.9), most frequently gastrointestinal bleeding. There were no overrepresentation of major bleedings among patients with gastrointestinal cancer (7/126, 5.5%, 95% CI 2.3-11%). Twenty-six patients experienced one or more clinically relevant non-major bleedings (8.9%, 95% CI 5.5-12%). Twelve patients had arterial thrombosis (4.0%, 95% CI 2.1-6.9%), of which the majority were strokes in patients with pancreatic cancer. Death occurred in 35 patients (12%, 95% CI 8.3-16%). CONCLUSION: The frequency of recurrent VTE and major bleedings are in line with other studies on apixaban in cancer-associated VTE. Arterial thrombosis was a frequent serious adverse event.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsHemorrhageHumansNeoplasmsPyrazolesPyridonesThrombosisVenous Thromboembolism

Summary

In this single-arm study, 298 cancer patients with VTE received apixaban for six months; recurrent VTE or VTE-related death occurred in 4.0%, major bleeding in 5.4%, and arterial thrombosis—mostly strokes in pancreatic cancer—was a frequent serious adverse event.

Context

This interventional study evaluates the outcomes of cancer patients treated with apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, for venous thromboembolism (VTE), measuring recurrent VTE, bleeding, and arterial thrombosis rates over six months. The results indicate that recurrent VTE and major bleeding frequencies align with existing literature, though arterial thrombosis emerged as a frequent serious adverse event. The study addresses the systemic inhibition of coagulation factors—a process modulated by leech secretions. The abstract does not mention leeches, leech extracts, or comparative biological therapies. The study strictly evaluates a synthetic factor Xa inhibitor in an oncology cohort.

Citation

Reference (Vancouver style)

Hannevik TL, Brekke J, Enden T, Frøen H, Garresori H, Jacobsen EM, et al. Thrombosis and bleedings in a cohort of cancer patients treated with apixaban for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res. 2020;196:238-244. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2020.08.042. PMID: 32919178

Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: November 1, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.