Global Variations in Surgical Techniques and Postoperative Care for Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF) in Head & Neck Surgery: A Cross-Sectional International Survey
Research article published in Journal of clinical medicine (2025)
Abstract
Objective: This cross-sectional survey aimed to comprehensively gather data on radial forearm free flap (RFFF) utilization and practices in head and neck reconstructive surgery. Methods: An online questionnaire was organized into seven sections: demographics, surgeon experience, harvesting techniques, microsurgical considerations, postoperative care, flap monitoring, and outcomes. It was distributed by email to 216 head and neck reconstructive surgeons who attended the International Federation of Head and Neck Oncologic Societies (IFHNOS) congress in Rome (21-25 June 2023) using the congress mailing list. Responses were collected from 54 surgeons (25% response rate), representing 15 countries across Europe, Asia, the Americas, and Oceania, underscoring the international scope of the survey between 5 February and 25 March 2024. The questionnaire was not formally piloted or validated. Missing data were managed on a per-question basis. Descriptive statistics were used, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for key surgical outcomes to indicate estimate precision. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 test with Cramér's V as an effect size, and relationships between continuous variables were examined using Spearman's rank correlation (ρ) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Given the exploratory design and limited sample size, no correction for multiple comparisons was applied, and the risk of both Type I and Type II errors was acknowledged. Results: Variations were observed in harvesting techniques, microsurgical preferences, and postoperative care protocols. Most surgeons initiated flap harvesting concurrently with tumor resection, primarily preserving superficial sensory nerves. Regarding venous outflow, 50% of respondents preferred the cephalic vein, 19% used comitant veins, and 29% utilized both systems when possible. Perioperative antibiotic use was standard practice, though anticoagulant preferences and flap monitoring methods varied. The study achieved a high success rate for RFFF procedures, exceeding 95%, with venous thrombosis identified as the main cause of flap failure. No significant correlations were found between flap failure rate and training method (p = 0.21), specialty (p = 0.37), annual number of RFFF procedures (p = 0.89), surgeon age (p = 0.42), or hospital type (p = 0.48). Effect sizes were small to moderate, indicating weak or negligible associations. Similarly, perioperative factors such as anticoagulant use (p = 0.84), preoperative antibiotics (p = 0.42), surgical instruments (p = 0.61), suture techniques (p = 0.51), and donor vein selection (p = 0.20) showed no statistically significant associations with flap loss. Patient satisfaction assessments were inconsistent, with only 39% of surgeons routinely performing them. Conclusions: The study provides valuable insights into current RFFF practices and outcomes across an international cohort of head and neck surgeons, highlighting patterns and variability in techniques, perioperative care, and monitoring strategies.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This cross-sectional international survey of 54 head and neck reconstructive surgeons (25% response rate, 15 countries) documented wide variation in radial forearm free flap technique, microsurgical and postoperative practice, reporting an overall RFFF success rate exceeding 95% and identifying venous thrombosis as the leading cause of flap failure, with no statistically significant association found between flap loss and anticoagulant use or other perioperative factors. This is meaningful background for hirudotherapy because medicinal leeches are most often used to rescue free flaps suffering venous congestion, and the survey confirms that venous thrombosis remains the principal threat to flap survival while also showing that anticoagulation practice is highly non-standardized. As a non-piloted, non-validated survey with a small self-selected sample and no leech-therapy variable, it describes practice patterns rather than testing any intervention, so its non-significant anticoagulation findings cannot be taken as evidence for or against adjunctive leech use.
Citation
Global Variations in Surgical Techniques and Postoperative Care for Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF) in Head & Neck Surgery: A Cross-Sectional International Survey.
Russo et al. · Journal of clinical medicine, 2025
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026