A comparative study of digital nerve and digital arterial repairs performed using running versus interrupted suture techniques in finger replantations
Retrospective cohort published in Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg (2023)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze replantations and compared the success rates of different suturing techniques. METHODS: The data of 54 patients who underwent 82 finger replantations between January 2016 and April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent traumatic total finger amputations were included in the study. Arteries were repaired with two techniques, the simple running suture technique and the simple interrupted suture technique. Demographic patient data, comorbidities, operative data, post-operative care, the length of hospital stay, mechanism of injury, and site of injury were recorded. The groups were statistically analyzed. Functional outcomes were evaluated according to the Quick DASH score. RESULTS: A total 54 patients with a mean age of 32.5±18.4 (range 1-75) who underwent finger replantation were included in the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 30.9±16.1 months. The mechanism of injury was guillotine-style injury in 29 (35.4%) fingers, avulsion injury in 15 (18.3%) fingers, and crush injury in 38 (46.3%) fingers. Forty-six fingers were repaired using a simple running suture technique, and 36 fingers were repaired using a simple interrupted suture technique. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of failure between the suture techniques (p=0.569). Further, although there was no statistically significant difference in Quick DASH scores according to the type of trauma in the simple running suture technique group (p=0.109), a comparison could not be made within simple interrupted suture technique group because of the small sample size. There was no statistically significant difference in failure rates between cases with an ischemia duration of <6 h and those with ischemia duration of 6-12 h (p>0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups according to age, body mass index, arterial hypertension, or diabetes mellitus (p>0.05). Statistically significant differences were found in univariate analysis according to surgery time per digit, smokers, or vein repair (p<0.05). In total, 65 (79.3%) out of 82 finger replantations were successful. A total of 17 out of 30 fingers that could not undergo venous repair survived because of treatment with medicinal leeches. CONCLUSION: Finger replantation is a difficult-to-perform surgical procedure requiring consideration of the surgical indications and the presence of an experienced surgical team. Regardless of the suture technique in finger amputations, performing venous anastomosis after arterial anastomosis is essential to restore circulation.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
82 finger replantations in 54 patients 2016-2020: 79.3% overall success; 17 of 30 fingers without venous repair survived via medicinal leech therapy.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This retrospective study analyzed 82 finger replantations in 54 patients (mean age 32.5) comparing running versus interrupted suture techniques for arterial repair, finding no statistically significant difference in failure rates between techniques (p=0.569), with an overall 79.3% success rate. Relevant to hirudotherapy, the abstract reports that 17 of 30 fingers that could not undergo venous repair survived because of treatment with medicinal leeches, supporting the established use of leech therapy for venous insufficiency in digital replantation when venous anastomosis is not possible. For ASH's domain, this provides clinical data on leech therapy as a salvage measure in a specific surgical context. The caveat is that leech therapy is a secondary finding within a surgical-technique comparison; no details on leech protocol, species, duration, complications, or comparative outcomes are provided.
Citation
A comparative study of digital nerve and digital arterial repairs performed using running versus interrupted suture techniques in finger replantations.
Ozdemir B, Kucukalp A · Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi, 2023
Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026