American Society of Hirudotherapy

Extended Anticoagulation Therapy With Rivaroxaban for Cancer-Associated Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism According to Different Performance Status Scores: Insights From the ONCO PE Randomized Trial

Research article published in Journal of the American Heart Association (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialSafety & Infection ControlXiong et al. · Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ONCO PE (Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation Therapy for Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Cancer) trial demonstrated the superiority of 18-month compared with 6-month rivaroxaban treatment for cancer-associated low-risk pulmonary embolism in reducing recurrent venous thromboembolism. However, it was uncertain whether the results could be applicable to patients with different performance status (PS) scores, which evaluate the physical condition of patients with cancer undergoing anticancer treatment. METHODS: In this post hoc subgroup analysis of the ONCO PE trial, we compared the 18-month and 6-month rivaroxaban treatment groups in 2 subgroups: the low PS score (no restricted physical activity: PS=0; n=79) and high PS score (restricted physical activity: PS ≥1; n=99) subgroups. The primary end point was recurrent venous thromboembolism, and the major secondary end point was major bleeding. RESULTS: The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 18-month rivaroxaban group than in the 6-month rivaroxaban group, significantly among the low PS score subgroup (2.7% versus 19.0%, P=0.049) and numerically among the high PS score subgroup without statistical significance (7.7% versus 19.1%, P=0.10). The rate of major bleeding was not different between the 2 groups among the low PS score subgroup (2.7% versus 7.1%, P=0.39), while it was numerically higher in the 18-month rivaroxaban group than in the 6-month rivaroxaban group among the high PS score subgroup, without statistical significance (11.5% versus 4.3%, P=0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Extended anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer-associated low-risk pulmonary embolism might have a potential benefit in reducing thrombotic risk irrespective of PS score, whereas there might be some concerns on an increased risk of major bleeding in patients with a high PS score. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04724460.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
Indexed MeSH termsHumansRivaroxabanPulmonary EmbolismFemaleMaleFactor Xa InhibitorsNeoplasmsMiddle AgedAgedTreatment OutcomeHemorrhageRecurrence

Summary

Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This post hoc subgroup analysis of the ONCO PE randomized trial compared 18-month versus 6-month rivaroxaban for cancer-associated low-risk pulmonary embolism across performance-status strata, reporting fewer recurrent venous thromboembolism events with extended therapy (significantly so in the low performance-status subgroup, 2.7% vs 19.0%) alongside a numerically higher major-bleeding signal in higher performance-status patients. Its relevance to hirudotherapy is contextual only: it belongs to the systemic oral-anticoagulation evidence base and underscores the recurring clinical tension between thrombosis prevention and bleeding risk, the same balance clinicians weigh around leech use. The honest caveat is that this is a subgroup analysis of a single trial involving a synthetic Factor Xa inhibitor with no leech component, so it carries no direct evidentiary weight for medicinal-leech therapy.

Citation

Extended Anticoagulation Therapy With Rivaroxaban for Cancer-Associated Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism According to Different Performance Status Scores: Insights From the ONCO PE Randomized Trial.

Xiong et al. · Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.