Epistaxis Versus Nonepistaxis Bleeding in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial
Research article published in Journal of the American Heart Association (2025)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epistaxis is common with antithrombotic therapy and is often troublesome to patients, yet its frequency, severity, and outcomes are poorly characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) randomized 21 105 patients with atrial fibrillation and CHADS2 risk score ≥2 to higher-dose edoxaban regimen (60 mg daily, dose-reduced to 30 mg), lower-dose edoxaban regimen (30 mg, dose reduced to 15 mg, daily), or warfarin. Bleeds were adjudicated using International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Patients with intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up were excluded; those with >1 bleeding event were categorized according to their most severe event. The safety cohort with interval censoring during drug interruption was analyzed. Proportions were compared using Pearson's chi-square test and treatment arms were compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. Among 5247 patients with a bleeding event, 1008 (19.2%) had epistaxis and 4239 (80.8%) had nonepistaxis bleeding. Epistaxis events were less severe than nonepistaxis bleeds (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major: 3.2% versus 20.7%; clinically relevant nonmajor: 64.7% versus 60.1%; minor: 32.1% versus 19.2%; P<0.001). Permanent drug discontinuation was similar following epistaxis versus nonepistaxis bleeding in patients with major (59.4% versus 53.6%; P=0.52) or clinically relevant nonmajor (32.5% versus 33.3%; P=0.70) bleeding but was significantly higher in patients with minor epistaxis versus other minor bleeds (33.3% versus 23.9%; P=0.001). Compared with warfarin, higher-dose edoxaban regimen had similar risk of epistaxis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09 [95% CI, 0.95-1.26]), whereas lower-dose edoxaban regimen conferred reduced risk (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.62-0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: Epistaxis was frequent, and despite being overall less severe than nonepistaxis bleeding, was associated with similar rates of anticoagulant discontinuation. Compared with warfarin, lower-dose edoxaban regimen reduced the risk of epistaxis by 27% whereas higher-dose edoxaban regimen had no effect. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00781391.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This secondary analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 randomized trial characterized bleeding in 21,105 anticoagulated atrial-fibrillation patients, finding that among 5,247 with a bleeding event, epistaxis (19.2%) was generally less severe than nonepistaxis bleeding yet drove similar rates of permanent anticoagulant discontinuation, and that the lower-dose edoxaban regimen reduced epistaxis risk versus warfarin (HR 0.73) while the higher dose did not. For hirudotherapy this is contextual rather than direct: leech therapy produces a localized, hirudin-mediated anticoagulant effect, and this trial is a useful reminder that even comparatively minor bleeding (epistaxis-like oozing) materially influences clinical decisions and treatment tolerability — relevant when assessing leech therapy in patients already on systemic anticoagulants. The honest caveat is that this is a post-hoc analysis of a pharmacologic anticoagulation trial in atrial fibrillation with no leech component, so any bearing on leech-related bleeding is by analogy only.
Citation
Epistaxis Versus Nonepistaxis Bleeding in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial.
Semco et al. · Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026