American Society of Hirudotherapy

Enhanced trial efficiency of the novel "contemporaneous control recapture" parallel-cohort RCT design: Methods and application in the CRITICAL-Kids-TP trial

Clinical trial published in Contemporary clinical trials (2025)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical TrialsSafety & Infection ControlSochet AA et al. · Contemporary clinical trials, 2025

Abstract

The efficiency and generalizability of the traditional randomized clinical trial (RCT) design are reduced by the exclusion of otherwise eligible participants who decline randomization or undergo early withdrawal due to missed protocol-specified windows for randomization and/or first dose of the investigational drug. These limitations are particularly challenging for RCTs targeting rare diseases. In this report, we describe a novel adaptation to the previously-described "parallel-cohort RCT design", in which these up-front losses in an RCT are recaptured into a parallel, non-randomized, contemporaneous control cohort that augments the randomized controls. We also outline various statistical approaches employed to assure congruence of this non-randomized control group to the control arm of the randomized population, prior to analysis. Lastly, we describe the application of the "contemporaneous control recapture" parallel-cohort RCT design in the CRITICAL-Kids-TP trial (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT06628778), a proposed phase 3 trial of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis versus usual care (no pharmacological thromboprophylaxis) in critically ill adolescents.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleClinical Trial Protocol
Indexed MeSH termsHumansResearch DesignAdolescentCritical IllnessRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCohort StudiesMaleVenous ThromboembolismFemaleClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicAnticoagulants

Summary

The efficiency and generalizability of the traditional randomized clinical trial (RCT) design are reduced by the exclusion of otherwise eligible participants who decline randomization or undergo early withdrawal due to missed protocol-specified windows for randomization and/or first dose of the investigational drug.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This methods paper describes a novel 'contemporaneous control recapture' adaptation of the parallel-cohort RCT design, in which otherwise-eligible participants who decline randomization or miss protocol windows are recaptured into a non-randomized contemporaneous control cohort that augments the randomized controls, with statistical approaches to confirm congruence before analysis; it illustrates the design in the planned phase 3 CRITICAL-Kids-TP trial of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis versus usual care in critically ill adolescents. It is relevant to ASH's clinical-evidence mission as a template for how rigorous trials of thromboprophylaxis can be made more efficient and generalizable, especially for rare or hard-to-enroll populations, which is precisely the constraint facing any future controlled study of hirudotherapy. The caveat is that this is a trial-design and protocol description, not results: it reports no efficacy or safety outcomes and concerns conventional pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, not leech therapy.

Citation

Enhanced trial efficiency of the novel "contemporaneous control recapture" parallel-cohort RCT design: Methods and application in the CRITICAL-Kids-TP trial.

Sochet AA et al. · Contemporary clinical trials, 2025

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.