Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Research article published in Thrombosis journal (2026)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children with congenital and acquired heart disease (CAHD) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Traditional anticoagulants such as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) present challenges in pediatrics due to burdensome administration, frequent monitoring, and adherence issues. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed adult anticoagulation, but their role in pediatric CAHD remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with standard-of-care (SOC) anticoagulation in pediatric patients with CAHD. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase through July 1, 2025. Eligible studies included RCTs comparing DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with VKAs, LMWH, or aspirin in patients < 18 years with CAHD. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for children with congenital heart disease (CHD). RESULTS: Four RCTs, including 732 patients, were analyzed. In the overall population (patients with congenital and acquired heart disease), DOACs significantly reduced thromboembolic events compared to standard-of-care anticoagulation (RR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.18–0.97; p = 0.04). In the prespecified congenital heart disease (CHD) subgroup, a trend toward reduced events was observed but did not reach statistical significance (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.06–1.29). Individual thromboembolic outcomes (stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and intracardiac thrombus) were rare, with no significant differences between DOAC and control groups in either the overall population or the CHD subgroup (all p > 0.05). Regarding safety, major bleeding rates were similar between DOAC and control groups in the overall population (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.25–3.35) and the CHD subgroup (RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.06–32.65). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding was also comparable between DOAC and control groups overall (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.23–1.68) and in the CHD subgroup (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.19–2.49). CONCLUSIONS: DOACs seem to be effective and safe for thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients with CAHD. They reduce the risk of thromboembolism without increasing bleeding complications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-026-00850-z.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled four randomized controlled trials (732 children with congenital or acquired heart disease) and found that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) significantly reduced thromboembolic events versus standard-of-care anticoagulation (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.97; p=0.04) without raising major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. For the hirudotherapy evidence picture, it maps the contemporary pharmacological anticoagulation landscape that any leech-derived antithrombin (hirudin and its analogues) is measured against, underscoring that the field's central challenge remains balancing antithrombotic efficacy against bleeding risk. Caveat: this concerns oral small-molecule anticoagulants, not leech therapy or its secretome; the pooled trial count is small, the congenital-heart-disease subgroup did not reach statistical significance, and the findings do not bear directly on leech use, which is established for venous congestion in flaps and reimplantation rather than systemic thromboprophylaxis.
Citation
Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bakry et al. · Thrombosis journal, 2026
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026