American Society of Hirudotherapy

Development of an Oral Anticoagulation Strategy for Permanent Artificial Lung Support

Research article published in Transplantation (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentHong et al. · Transplantation, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) systems for permanent respiratory support are currently under development as an alternative to lung transplantation. Direct oral anticoagulants are a promising alternative to heparin due to their oral administration and predictable pharmacology. METHODS: The efficacy of rivaroxaban for artificial surface anticoagulation was evaluated using 3 studies that determined (1) the pharmacological behavior of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg doses of rivaroxaban in sheep; (2) the artificial surface anticoagulation efficacy of these 3 doses compared with heparin in a short-term mini-ECMO model; and (3) the efficacy of the optimal dose from study 2 with simulated oral pharmacokinetics in an extended-duration mini-ECMO model. RESULTS: Study 1 found that sheep have a higher volume of distribution (2.2 ± 0.4 L/kg) and a shorter half-life (1.4 ± 0.1 h) for rivaroxaban than humans but a similar linear relationship between prothrombin time and rivaroxaban plasma concentration. In study 2, device survival time in the heparin group (57.5 ± 13.0 min) was most similar to the 0.5 mg/kg rivaroxaban group (51.3 ± 8.8 min; P  = 0.287). This dose was selected for study 3, and no difference was found in device survival time between heparin (6.3 ± 1.3 h) and the 0.5 mg/kg rivaroxaban infusion (6.3 ± 1.6 h; P  = 0.837). Furthermore, the calculated rivaroxaban exposure was similar to the clinically approved oral rivaroxaban doses (24-h area under the plasma concentration curve = 2074 µg h/L). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that rivaroxaban has artificial surface anticoagulation efficacy similar to that of heparin at dosages that are feasible for oral administration in humans. Future studies will evaluate rivaroxaban anticoagulation using a 10-d full-scale ovine ECMO model.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsRivaroxabanAnimalsAdministration, OralExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFactor Xa InhibitorsSheepAnticoagulantsHumansHeparinBlood CoagulationDose-Response Relationship, Drug

Summary

Peer-reviewed research on therapeutic compound development relevant to leech-derived anticoagulants and antithrombotic agents. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This animal study tested whether oral-feasible doses of rivaroxaban (a Factor Xa inhibitor) could anticoagulate the artificial surfaces of a developmental ECMO/artificial-lung system, and found in a sheep mini-ECMO model that 0.5 mg/kg rivaroxaban gave device survival times comparable to heparin at exposures close to clinically approved oral doses. The connection to hirudotherapy is only at the broad level of anticoagulation pharmacology and surface-contact clotting; this work is about a synthetic oral anticoagulant for a mechanical circuit and has no involvement of medicinal leeches or the leech secretome. The honest caveat is that this is a preclinical ovine model of a device still under development, not a clinical study, and it should not be read as bearing on leech therapy specifically.

Citation

Development of an Oral Anticoagulation Strategy for Permanent Artificial Lung Support.

Hong et al. · Transplantation, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.