American Society of Hirudotherapy

Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants and Home Time After Venous Thromboembolism in Frail and Non-Frail Older Adults

Research article published in American journal of hematology (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyClinical TrialsPark CM et al. · American journal of hematology, 2026

Abstract

In this retrospective cohort of 18 066 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries ≥ 65 years with acute VTE (2015-2019), we compared apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin using propensity score (PS) overlap weighting and intention-to-treat analyses across total, non-frail, and frail strata defined by a claims-based frailty index. After PS weighting (all SMDs < 0.10), apixaban versus warfarin was associated with a lower 1-year composite of recurrent VTE or death in the total population (189.1 versus 216.1 per 1000 PY; HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96), with benefit evident in non-frail patients (114.5 versus 143.6; HR 0.78, 0.66-0.92) and attenuated in frail patients (330.9 versus 349.9; HR 0.93, 0.82-1.07). Recurrent VTE rates favored apixaban but were not statistically significant overall (40.5 versus 54.8; HR 0.86, 0.68-1.08). Major bleeding was lower with apixaban (19.4 versus 26.0; HR 0.73, 0.53-1.00). Home-time loss was reduced with apixaban compared with warfarin in the total population (mean 54.9 versus 67.0 days; RR 0.89, 0.83-0.96) and was directionally similar across both frailty strata. Rivaroxaban showed no clear advantage over warfarin for the composite (216.9 versus 216.1; HR 1.00, 0.90-1.11) or bleeding (HR 0.99, 0.73-1.32) and yielded greater home-time loss than apixaban (RR 1.08, 1.01-1.17). Overall, apixaban demonstrated the most favorable balance of effectiveness, safety, and patient-centered benefit, with patterns generally consistent across frailty levels.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleComparative StudyResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Indexed MeSH termsHumansAgedAnticoagulantsMaleFemaleVenous ThromboembolismAged, 80 and overRetrospective StudiesWarfarinFrail ElderlyPyrazolesPyridones

Summary

Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This retrospective cohort of 18,066 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older with acute venous thromboembolism compared apixaban, rivaroxaban and warfarin using propensity-score overlap weighting, and found apixaban associated with a lower one-year composite of recurrent VTE or death (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96), lower major bleeding, and less lost home-time versus warfarin, with the effectiveness benefit attenuated in frail patients and rivaroxaban showing no clear advantage. Its connection to hirudotherapy is only as anticoagulation-landscape background: it maps where modern oral anticoagulants stand for systemic VTE, the clinical territory against which any future hirudin- or leech-secretome-derived anticoagulant would have to be benchmarked, and does not examine leeches or topical/local leech use at all. As a non-randomized claims-based cohort it is subject to residual confounding and addresses systemic thromboprophylaxis, not the localized venous-congestion indication where medicinal leeches are actually applied.

Citation

Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants and Home Time After Venous Thromboembolism in Frail and Non-Frail Older Adults.

Park CM et al. · American journal of hematology, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.