Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Various Anticoagulation Regimens for Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Research article published in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis (2025)
Abstract
BackgroundPortal venous thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication in cirrhosis, with management debated due to differing anticoagulant guidelines. This network meta-analysis assessed various anticoagulants for PVT in cirrhotic patients.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Central, and ScienceDirect were searched till May 2025. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted in RStudio version 4.3.3. The ranking was based on P-scores.ResultsNineteen studies were included in the analysis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (RR = 2.38; 95%CI:[1.17, 4.85]; p = 0.02), fondaparinux (RR = 18.16; 95%CI:[2.09, 158.13]; p = 0.009), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (RR = 11.96; 95%CI:[1.58, 90.79]; p = 0.01), LMWH-Warfarin sequential therapy (RR = 2.32; 95%CI:[1.01, 5.31]; p = 0.04), and Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (RR = 1.71; 95%CI:[1.03, 2.83]; p = 0.04) showed a significant increase in complete recanalization, with fondaparinux ranked highest (P-score = 0.94). DOACs (RR = 0.23;95%CI:[0.07, 0.71]; p = 0.01), LMWH (RR = 0.24;95%CI:[0.11, 0.52]; p = 0.0003), LMWH-Warfarin sequential therapy (RR = 0.40;95%CI:[0.21, 0.77]; p = 0.006) demonstrated a significant reduction in PVT progression, with Antithrombin-III ranked highest (P-score = 0.87). Fondaparinux was ranked highest (P-score = 0.90) for reducing esophageal variceal bleeding, while LMWH was ranked highest (P-score = 0.72) for decreasing overall bleeding. DOACs significantly decreased mortality (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: [0.67, 0.81]; p < 0.0001), with LMWH ranked highest (P-score = 0.80) for mortality.ConclusionDOACs, LMWH, and LMWH-Warfarin sequential therapy significantly improved recanalization and reduced PVT progression. LMWH was ranked highest in reducing bleeding and mortality, while fondaparinux ranked highest regarding esophageal bleeding and complete recanalization.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This systematic review and network meta-analysis of 19 studies compared anticoagulant regimens for portal venous thrombosis in cirrhosis, finding that DOACs, LMWH, and LMWH-warfarin sequential therapy improved recanalization and reduced thrombus progression, with LMWH ranked highest for reducing both bleeding and mortality and fondaparinux ranked highest for complete recanalization and reducing variceal bleeding. It is relevant to hirudotherapy mainly as evidence of the persistent clinical need for anticoagulants that resolve thrombosis without provoking bleeding in fragile, bleeding-prone patients — the precise tension the leech secretome's natural antithrombotics are studied to address. The caveat is that this network meta-analysis pools heterogeneous studies of conventional systemic anticoagulants (with wide confidence intervals on several estimates) in cirrhotic patients and includes no leech-derived therapy, so it characterizes the unmet-need landscape rather than offering any hirudotherapy evidence.
Citation
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Various Anticoagulation Regimens for Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Abideen et al. · Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2025
Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026