American Society of Hirudotherapy

Clinical outcomes following catheter-related venous thrombo-embolism among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Multicenter study published in Thrombosis research (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyClinical TrialsPelland-Marcotte MC et al. · Thrombosis research, 2026

Abstract

Venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) occurs in 10-15% of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), yet the optimal duration of anticoagulation remains unclear. In this retrospective multi-center cohort study, we reported the clinical outcomes of pediatric patients treated for ALL with a history of central venous catheter (CVC)-related VTE and compared outcomes based on duration of anticoagulation. Patients aged 1-21 years old with newly-diagnosed ALL (2010-2023), receiving asparaginase-containing chemotherapy, experiencing a radiologically-proven CVC-related VTE requiring medical intervention, were included. Cumulative incidence and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for VTE progression/recurrence and clinically relevant bleeding. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to compare clinical outcomes based on anticoagulation duration, categorized as a) asparaginase-based (following a 6-week course of anticoagulation, until the end of asparaginase' expected effects or earlier) or extended (later than asparaginase's expected effects), and b) before vs. after CVC removal. We included 106 patients (median age: 10 years, 59% male). Overall, 22 patients sustained a VTE progression/recurrence (cumulative incidence: 22%, 95% CI: 14-30%). Most progression/recurrences occurred while patients were still on anticoagulation, at a median of 54 days after index VTE. Duration of anticoagulation was not associated with VTE progression/recurrence (extended vs. asparaginase-based: HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 0.60-3.69, p = 0.392; after vs. before CVC removal: HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.49-3.74, p = 0.552). Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 11/106 patients (cumulative incidence: 12%, 95% CI: 6-19%) and was not associated with anticoagulation duration. In summary, VTE progression/recurrence was common in pediatric patients with ALL. Further investigation into alternative approaches to reduce VTE progression/recurrence is warranted.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleMulticenter Study
Indexed MeSH termsHumansChildMalePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaFemaleAdolescentChild, PreschoolVenous ThromboembolismRetrospective StudiesInfantYoung AdultCentral Venous Catheters

Summary

Venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) occurs in 10-15% of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), yet the optimal duration of anticoagulation remains unclear.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This retrospective multicenter cohort of 106 children (ages 1-21) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and central-venous-catheter-related venous thromboembolism found that 22% had VTE progression or recurrence and 12% had clinically relevant bleeding, with no significant difference by anticoagulation duration (asparaginase-based vs extended; before vs after catheter removal). Its relevance to ASH is contextual: it shows that optimal anticoagulation strategy for catheter-associated clots remains unresolved even with modern pharmaceutical agents, framing the broader unmet need that motivates interest in alternative and leech-derived antithrombotic mechanisms. Honest caveat: this is an observational pediatric oncology cohort of conventional anticoagulants; it studies no leeches, makes no hirudotherapy claim, and -- given hirudotherapy is not indicated in this thrombocytopenia-prone, bleeding-risk population -- must not be framed as supporting leech therapy here.

Citation

Clinical outcomes following catheter-related venous thrombo-embolism among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Pelland-Marcotte MC et al. · Thrombosis research, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.