American Society of Hirudotherapy

Clinical Analysis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia due to Therapeutic Plasmapheresis With Heparin Anticoagulation

Research article published in Seminars in dialysis (2025)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical TrialsLv C et al. · Seminars in dialysis, 2025

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) following therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with heparin anticoagulation in patients with neurological autoimmune diseases. METHODS: Clinical data were prospectively collected from 158 patients (79 males, 79 females; mean age 37.49 ± 16.95 years) with neurological autoimmune diseases who underwent TPE in the neuro-intensive care unit between January 2016 and June 2024. For patients with continuous platelet decline after TPE, the 4Ts score was determined, and platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody tests were performed. Their platelet counts, clinical complications (thrombosis and bleeding), treatment plans, outcomes, and prognoses before and after TPE were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients experienced at least one significant decrease in platelet count during TPE (average decrease 36.75 ± 19.63%), and the average 4Ts score was 3.55 ± 1.87 points. PF4 antibody testing was conducted on 23 patients with continuous platelet decline and 4Ts scores ≥ 4. Four PF4-positive patients were diagnosed with type II HIT and developed deep vein thrombosis. After heparin withdrawal, the platelet count gradually normalized after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), nonheparin TPE, or argatroban/fondaparinux anticoagulant therapy (mean recovery time 8.17 ± 3.54 days). The platelet counts spontaneously recovered for the remaining 116 patients (mean recovery time 3.88 ± 2.66 days). CONCLUSION: Platelet counts should be dynamically monitored throughout TPE with heparin anticoagulation. Patients with continually decreasing platelet counts and an intermediate to high 4Ts score should be monitored for HIT. Heparin should be discontinued immediately for patients with type II HIT, and nonheparin anticoagulants, IVIG, or nonheparin TPE may be administered.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansMaleFemaleHeparinThrombocytopeniaAnticoagulantsPlasmapheresisMiddle AgedAdultProspective StudiesPlatelet CountAged

Summary

We investigated the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) following therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with heparin anticoagulation in patients with neurological autoimmune diseases.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This prospective single-center study of 158 neuro-intensive-care patients undergoing heparin-anticoagulated therapeutic plasma exchange found that four developed type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with deep-vein thrombosis, recovering only after heparin withdrawal and switching to non-heparin agents such as argatroban or fondaparinux. For ASH the value is contextual: it documents a real limitation of heparin, the immune-mediated HIT reaction, which is part of why the field continues to explore alternative anticoagulant mechanisms, including the direct thrombin-inhibition pathway represented by leech-derived hirudin that does not depend on the heparin–PF4 axis. Honest caveat: this is a small, single-center observational series about heparin safety and HIT management; it neither tests nor mentions hirudotherapy or any leech-derived agent, so any link to the leech secretome is interpretive background only.

Citation

Clinical Analysis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia due to Therapeutic Plasmapheresis With Heparin Anticoagulation.

Lv C et al. · Seminars in dialysis, 2025

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.