American Society of Hirudotherapy

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke on Anticoagulation Therapy.

Research article published in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology (2018)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportClinical TrialsDrug DevelopmentČerník et al. · Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2018

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (IS) can be performed also in patients on anticoagulation therapy (AT); however, sufficient and reliable data about safety and efficacy of MT are still missing. Thus, we aimed to compare these parameters between patients treated on AT and without AT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive IS patients treated with MT using stent retrievers were included in the retrospective analysis. Neurological deficit was scored using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and 90-day clinical outcome using modified Rankin scale with a score 0-2 for good outcome. Recanalization was rated using Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) was assessed according to the SITS-MOST criteria. RESULTS: Out of 703 patients treated with MT, 88 (12.5%) patients (46% males, mean age 75.5 ± 11.8 years) were on AT with an admission median NIHSS of 17 points. Recanalization (TICI 2b-3) was achieved in 80% and complete (TICI 3) in 65% of patients on AT and in 80 and 65% of patients without AT (p-1.000). SICH after MT was detected in 9% of AT and 5% of non-AT patients (p-0.136). Good outcome was present in 36% of AT patients (p-0.03). AT patients with poor outcome had more frequently atrial fibrillation (93%, p-0.005), higher admission NIHSS (17, p-0.004) and higher rate of SICH (14.5%, p-0.047). CONCLUSION: MT seems to be safe also in patients on AT. Poor outcome may be related to higher admission NIHSS, higher rate of SICH and presence of atrial fibrillation.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAnticoagulantsBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesStrokeThrombectomyTreatment Outcome

Summary

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (IS) can be performed also in patients on anticoagulation therapy (AT); however, sufficient and reliable data about safety and efficacy of MT are still missing. Thus, we aimed to compare these parameters between patients treated on AT and without AT. All consecutive IS patients treated with MT using stent retrievers were included in the retrospective analysis.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This retrospective single-center analysis compared mechanical thrombectomy outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients who were on anticoagulation therapy versus those who were not (88 of 703 patients on anticoagulation), reporting similar recanalization rates (TICI 2b-3 in 80% of both groups) and no statistically significant excess of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (9% vs 5%, p=0.136), while poorer functional outcomes in the anticoagulated group (good outcome in 36%) were associated with higher admission NIHSS, more atrial fibrillation, and higher hemorrhage rates. For ASH this sits in the clinical-evidence picture surrounding anticoagulation rather than hirudotherapy itself: it documents how systemic anticoagulant status interacts with acute stroke intervention and bleeding risk, the same safety axis relevant to any leech-derived anticoagulant in the secretome drug-discovery story. As a retrospective, non-randomized cohort from one center, the comparisons are observational and the authors' own conclusion that thrombectomy 'seems' safe on anticoagulation should be read as hypothesis-generating; the study involves no leech-derived compounds.

Citation

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke on Anticoagulation Therapy.

Černík et al. · Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2018

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.