American Society of Hirudotherapy

Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry

Comparison study published in BMC Anesthesiology (2018)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialClinical TrialsDrug DevelopmentBeiderlinden M et al. · BMC anesthesiology, 2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation therapy in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT suspect is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although aPTT correlates well with plasma levels of argatroban and lepirudin in healthy volunteers, it might not be the method of choice in critically ill patients. However, in-vivo data is lacking for this patient population. Therefore, we studied in vivo whether ROTEM or global clotting times would provide an alternative for monitoring the anticoagulant intensity effects in critically ill patients. METHODS: This study was part of the double-blind randomized trial "Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia)", which compared critically ill patients treated with argatroban or lepirudin. Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, for this sub-study blood of 35 critically ill patients was analysed. Before as well as 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initiation of argatroban or lepirudin infusion, blood was analysed for aPTT, aPTT ratios, thrombin time (TT), INTEM CT,INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios and maximum clot firmness (MCF) and correlated with the corresponding plasma concentrations of the direct thrombin inhibitor. RESULTS: To reach a target aPTT of 1.5 to 2 times baseline, median [IQR] plasma concentrations of 0.35 [0.01-1.2] μg/ml argatroban and 0.17 [0.1-0.32] μg/ml lepirudin were required. For both drugs, there was no significant correlation between aPTT and aPTT ratios and plasma concentrations. INTEM CT, INTEM CT ratios, EXTEM CT, EXTEM CT ratios, TT and TT ratios correlated significantly with plasma concentrations of both drugs. Additionally, agreement between argatroban plasma levels and EXTEM CT and EXTEM CT ratios were superior to agreement between argatroban plasma levels and aPTT in the Bland Altman analysis. MCF remained unchanged during therapy with both drugs. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, TT and ROTEM parameters may provide better correlation to argatroban and lepirudin plasma concentrations than aPTT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00798525 , registered on 25 Nov 2008.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAnticoagulantsArginineBlood CoagulationBlood Coagulation TestsCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodDrug MonitoringFemaleHirudinsHumansMale

Summary

Compares aPTT vs rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for monitoring leech-derived lepirudin and synthetic argatroban in ICU. ROTEM provides more reliable detection of hypocoagulation.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This sub-study of the double-blind randomized 'ALicia' trial (Beiderlinden et al., BMC Anesthesiology 2018) analyzed blood from 35 critically ill patients treated with argatroban or lepirudin for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (or suspected HIT) to test whether rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and global clotting times better reflect drug levels than the standard aPTT; aPTT and aPTT ratios did not correlate significantly with plasma drug concentrations, whereas thrombin time and several ROTEM parameters (INTEM/EXTEM clotting times) did, and EXTEM clotting time showed superior agreement with argatroban levels. For hirudotherapy, this matters because lepirudin is a recombinant hirudin, a direct descendant of the leech salivary anticoagulant, so the study informs how leech-derived thrombin inhibitors are accurately dosed in fragile patients. Honest caveat: this is a small (35-patient) sub-analysis of one randomized trial focused on laboratory monitoring of injectable drugs in the ICU, not an evaluation of leech therapy, and the authors call for broader confirmation.

Citation

Monitoring of argatroban and lepirudin anticoagulation in critically ill patients by conventional laboratory parameters and rotational thromboelastometry.

Beiderlinden M et al. · BMC anesthesiology, 2018

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.