American Society of Hirudotherapy

The new anticoagulants

Research article published in Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy (2007)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewDrug DevelopmentStone WM et al. · Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy, 2007

Abstract

Currently, the anticoagulants available are limited to warfarin, heparin compounds, and direct thrombin inhibitors. Warfarin, the most commonly used outpatient anticoagulant, has significant shortcomings. There are numerous drug/drug and drug/food interactions, and there is difficulty in dosing for one-third of patients. Numerous new anticoagulants are undergoing testing. The meta-pentasaccharides use the core molecule of heparin and replace one or more of the sulphated groups. They are administered by subcutaneous injection, but they require only once per week dosing. Numerous studies have shown equivalents or superiority to warfarin in treatment for thromboembolic events. Direct thrombin inhibitors block thrombin (IIa) and are used mostly for heparin-induced thrombosis or during coronary interventions. However, there is an orally administered direct thrombin inhibitor, Dabigatran, which is undergoing phase III testing. It can be given without regard to weight, age, or gender with minimal drug interactions. This drug has been proven to be equivalent to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis and showed no excess bleeding. Another promising group of anticoagulants with numerous investigations underway are the direct X inhibitors. Most are excreted renally as opposed to hepatic clearance with intravenous or oral dosing. Numerous phase II studies have shown them to have equivalent or superior prophylaxis for DVT when compared with LMWH. Oral IXa inhibitors and an oral thrombin cofactor inhibitor are also under development. It is clear that in the near future, anticoagulants will be available that offer significant advantages when compared to those currently in use.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsAntithrombin IIIBenzimidazolesDabigatranHumansOligosaccharidesPyridinesThrombinWarfarin

Summary

Peer-reviewed leech-derived compound and anticoagulant pharmacology relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This review ("The new anticoagulants") surveys the limitations of warfarin and heparin and maps the emerging classes of targeted anticoagulants, including the direct thrombin (factor IIa) inhibitors used for heparin-induced thrombosis and coronary interventions, and the orally administered direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran then in phase III, along with direct factor Xa inhibitors that the abstract reports gave equivalent or superior DVT prophylaxis versus LMWH in phase II studies. For hirudotherapy this is useful background context: the direct-thrombin-inhibitor concept it describes is the same mechanism embodied by hirudin, the medicinal leech's signature antithrombin, situating the leech secretome within the broader anticoagulant drug-discovery story rather than as a folk remedy. As an honest caveat, this is a narrative review that summarizes the development pipeline of synthetic drugs and makes no claim about leech therapy or about hirudin itself, so it informs mechanism and historical framing only, not any clinical evidence for hirudotherapy.

Citation

The new anticoagulants.

Stone WM et al. · Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy, 2007

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.