American Society of Hirudotherapy

Effectiveness of leech therapy in chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial

Bäcker M, Lüdtke R, Afra D, Cesur Ö, Langhorst J, Fink M, Bachmann J, Dobos GJ, Michalsen A (2011) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · n=40

RCT evidence detailTrial reference
Sample size of this trial compared with other Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow) trialsStange R 201252Bäcker M 201140
This trial (highlighted) by sample size alongside other indexed Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow) trials. Larger trials generally carry more statistical weight.

Study Profile

Design
single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial (Kliniken Essen-Mitte)
Sample size (n)
40
Intervention
Single treatment with 2-4 locally applied Hirudo medicinalis leeches over the lateral epicondyle
Comparator
30-day course of topical diclofenac applied to the lateral epicondyle
Primary endpoint
Change of pain sum score on day 7, calculated from 3 VAS scales for pain during motion, grip, and rest
Primary result
Pain sum score decreased from 143.7 ± 36.9 to 95.3 ± 45.1 in leech group vs 131.6 ± 29.6 to 134.7 ± 70.7 in diclofenac group at day 7 (mean difference -49.0, 95% CI -82.9 to -15.1, p=0.0075); group difference reduced by day 45 (-27.5, p=0.110) as diclofenac effect emerged
Follow-up duration
45 days

Key Findings

  • First RCT of leech therapy for chronic lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow)
  • Significant short-term (7-day) pain reduction vs topical diclofenac
  • DASH disability score improved more strongly in leech arm, with effect most prominent at day 45 (p=0.0007)
  • Quality-of-life (SF-36) increased non-significantly in leech group; grip strength favored leech
  • Results not affected by outcome expectation — argues against pure placebo explanation

Limitations

  • Single center (Kliniken Essen-Mitte) — same group as Michalsen 2003 and Michalsen 2008
  • Open-label, no sham control
  • Small sample (n=40)
  • Topical diclofenac comparator may underestimate maximum NSAID effect (oral or injection routes not tested)
  • 45-day follow-up too short for a chronic-relapsing condition

Clinical Implications

Bäcker 2011 extended hirudotherapy's evidence base from OA into tendinopathy and is the first RCT of leech therapy for lateral epicondylitis indexed in PubMed. The 7-day onset of pain relief in a notoriously refractory condition supports cautious clinical use, particularly for NSAID-intolerant or corticosteroid-averse patients. The trial is referenced in subsequent narrative reviews of leech therapy for pain syndromes (Koeppen 2013 Wien Med Wochenschr) and supports the ASH clinical indication for lateral epicondylitis at the GRADE 'low' tier pending independent replication outside Essen.

Related Trials

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.